From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 18/21] rxrpc: Use ktimes for call timeout tracking and set the timer lazily
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 23:58:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <645802.1709510325@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240302212702.15b04552@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Track the call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies as the latter's
> > granularity is too high and only set the timer at the end of the event
> > handling function.
>
> This one has a 64b div somewhere, breaks 32b builds.
Ah - in the trace functions to make the ns-level durations into ms-level ones.
I wonder if it's better to just divide by 1024 - so something close to
microseconds - or whether ktime_to_us() can be used there.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-03 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-01 16:37 [PATCH net-next 00/21] rxrpc: Miscellaneous changes and make use of MSG_SPLICE_PAGES David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 01/21] rxrpc: Record the Tx serial in the rxrpc_txbuf and retransmit trace David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 02/21] rxrpc: Convert rxrpc_txbuf::flags into a mask and don't use atomics David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 03/21] rxrpc: Note cksum in txbuf David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 04/21] rxrpc: Fix the names of the fields in the ACK trailer struct David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 05/21] rxrpc: Strip barriers and atomics off of timer tracking David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 06/21] rxrpc: Remove atomic handling on some fields only used in I/O thread David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 07/21] rxrpc: Do lazy DF flag resetting David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 08/21] rxrpc: Merge together DF/non-DF branches of data Tx function David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 09/21] rxrpc: Add a kvec[] to the rxrpc_txbuf struct David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 10/21] rxrpc: Split up the DATA packet transmission function David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 11/21] rxrpc: Don't pick values out of the wire header when setting up security David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 12/21] rxrpc: Move rxrpc_send_ACK() to output.c with rxrpc_send_ack_packet() David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 13/21] rxrpc: Use rxrpc_txbuf::kvec[0] instead of rxrpc_txbuf::wire David Howells
2024-03-03 5:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 14/21] rxrpc: Do zerocopy using MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and page frags David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 15/21] rxrpc: Parse received packets before dealing with timeouts David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 16/21] rxrpc: Don't permit resending after all Tx packets acked David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 17/21] rxrpc: Differentiate PING ACK transmission traces David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 18/21] rxrpc: Use ktimes for call timeout tracking and set the timer lazily David Howells
2024-03-03 5:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-03 23:58 ` David Howells [this message]
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 19/21] rxrpc: Record probes after transmission and reduce number of time-gets David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 20/21] rxrpc: Clean up the resend algorithm David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 21/21] rxrpc: Extract useful fields from a received ACK to skb priv data David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=645802.1709510325@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).