From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
syzbot+f527b971b4bdc8e79f9e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v2] udp: Fix __ip{,6}_append_data()'s handling of MSG_SPLICE_PAGES
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 17:17:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64c97684ee5e3_1d7aa3294da@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1569149.1690924207@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
David Howells wrote:
> __ip_append_data() can get into an infinite loop when asked to splice into
> a partially-built UDP message that has more than the frag-limit data and up
> to the MTU limit. Something like:
>
> pipe(pfd);
> sfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> connect(sfd, ...);
> send(sfd, buffer, 8161, MSG_CONFIRM|MSG_MORE);
> write(pfd[1], buffer, 8);
> splice(pfd[0], 0, sfd, 0, 0x4ffe0ul, 0);
>
> where the amount of data given to send() is dependent on the MTU size (in
> this instance an interface with an MTU of 8192).
>
> The problem is that the calculation of the amount to copy in
> __ip_append_data() goes negative in two places, and, in the second place,
> this gets subtracted from the length remaining, thereby increasing it.
>
> This happens when pagedlen > 0 (which happens for MSG_ZEROCOPY and
> MSG_SPLICE_PAGES), the terms in:
>
> copy = datalen - transhdrlen - fraggap - pagedlen;
>
> then mostly cancel when pagedlen is substituted for, leaving just -fraggap.
> This causes:
>
> length -= copy + transhdrlen;
>
> to increase the length to more than the amount of data in msg->msg_iter,
> which causes skb_splice_from_iter() to be unable to fill the request and it
> returns less than 'copied' - which means that length never gets to 0 and we
> never exit the loop.
>
> Fix this by:
>
> (1) Insert a note about the dodgy calculation of 'copy'.
>
> (2) If MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, clear copy if it is negative from the above
> equation, so that 'offset' isn't regressed and 'length' isn't
> increased, which will mean that length and thus copy should match the
> amount left in the iterator.
>
> (3) When handling MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, give a warning and return -EIO if
> we're asked to splice more than is in the iterator. It might be
> better to not give the warning or even just give a 'short' write.
>
> The same problem occurs in __ip6_append_data(), except that there's a check
> in there that errors out with EINVAL if copy < 0. Fix this function in
> much the same way as the ipv4 variant but also skip the erroring out if
> copy < 0.
I don't think the two should be combined.
Removing that branch actually opens up to new bugs, e.g., in MSG_ZEROCOPY.
Since the ipv6 stack is not subject to this bug in MSG_SPLICE_PAGES,
I think v1 on its own is correct, and has the right Fixes tag.
If we think this IPv6 branch is mistaken and a bug, then that would
have a different Fixes tag, going back to ancient history. But arguably
safer to limit that net-next, if touching that at all.
It makes sense to update MSG_SPLICE_PAGES in the IPv6 path to be
equivalent to the IPv4 path, and to be correct if that branch is
ever removed.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-01 21:10 [PATCH net v2] udp: Fix __ip{,6}_append_data()'s handling of MSG_SPLICE_PAGES David Howells
2023-08-01 21:17 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64c97684ee5e3_1d7aa3294da@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+f527b971b4bdc8e79f9e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).