From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=K2gs=AJ=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F23BC433E0
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:36:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E368E20663
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:36:41 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com header.b="UTd3whxY"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726345AbgF1Vgl (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 28 Jun 2020 17:36:41 -0400
Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:59466 "EHLO
        mail-40131.protonmail.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726080AbgF1Vgk (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 17:36:40 -0400
Date:   Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:36:35 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
        s=protonmail; t=1593380198;
        bh=611E1eaCtuc3naAABWAMEtUCV7hXLVNANRYQvXdlbqY=;
        h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
        b=UTd3whxYh7s/isoSItdvlX/u0+p9RL1tVcT6cVqLmV2fM+2pWJuoK1mjbkgePAIsw
         BUZPvL+CpRF38d64Kcpw5JohHQS+RklzXtrkPU19AVUJPhkHy7PD9Xbpwa/3UlhiLR
         Itof7vPnT5j8WzLJkFsUprx+yvO6c7htKAWmok4o=
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
From:   Colton Lewis <colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org
Reply-To: Colton Lewis <colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: phylink: correct trivial kernel-doc inconsistencies
Message-ID: <6541539.18pcnM708K@laptop.coltonlewis.name>
In-Reply-To: <20200628093634.GQ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20200621154248.GB338481@lunn.ch> <20200621155345.GV1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <3315816.iIbC2pHGDl@laptop.coltonlewis.name> <20200621234431.GZ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <3034206.AJdgDx1Vlc@laptop.coltonlewis.name> <20200627235803.101718-1-colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com> <20200628093634.GQ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

> We seem to be having a communication breakdown.  In review to your
> version 2 patch set, I said:
>=20
>    However, please drop all your changes for everything but the
>    "struct phylink_config" documentation change; I'm intending to change
>    all these method signatures, which means your changes will conflict.
>=20
> But the changes still exist in version 3.  What gives?

You said *drop all your changes* for *everything but* the struct phylink_co=
nfig change. I interpreted this to mean you wanted *only* struct phylink_co=
nfig. In context of your previous comments, I might have guessed you meant =
the opposite.