From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Herbert Subject: Re: [RFC v2: Patch 1/3] net: hand off skb list to other cpu to submit to upper layer Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:53:47 -0700 Message-ID: <65634d660903160953o563385f8p29c0da5e3128f6f@mail.gmail.com> References: <65634d660903131724s49009177pdc11005aa76a4b56@mail.gmail.com> <20090313.191951.228619450.davem@davemloft.net> <65634d660903141115w7e164134ycece307f041e93a9@mail.gmail.com> <20090314.114522.19720687.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com, andi@firstfloor.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, shemminger@vyatta.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:28710 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754961AbZCPQxy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:53:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090314.114522.19720687.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:45 AM, David Miller wr= ote: > > From: Tom Herbert > Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:15:21 -0700 > > > I suppose it may be counter-intuitive, but I am not making a genera= l > > claim. =A0I would only suggest that these software hacks could be a= very > > good approximation or substitute for hardware functionality. =A0Thi= s is > > a generic way to get more performance out of deficient or lower end > > NICs. > > They certainly could. =A0Why don't you post the current version > of your patches so we have something concrete to discuss? I'll do that.