netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	 "jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	 "kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 xudingke <xudingke@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v3] tun: add missing rx stats accounting in tun_xdp_act
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:44:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65a9393d75353_1c8cde294e2@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed6fd9c514ae4a449580d11c9c6ba8e7@huawei.com>

wangyunjian wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Willem de Bruijn [mailto:willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 11:42 PM
> > To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>;
> > willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com; jasowang@redhat.com; kuba@kernel.org;
> > davem@davemloft.net
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; xudingke
> > <xudingke@huawei.com>; wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] tun: add missing rx stats accounting in tun_xdp_act
> > 
> > Yunjian Wang wrote:
> > > The TUN can be used as vhost-net backend, and it is necessary to count
> > > the packets transmitted from TUN to vhost-net/virtio-net. However,
> > > there are some places in the receive path that were not taken into
> > > account when using XDP. The commit 8ae1aff0b331 ("tuntap: split out
> > > XDP logic") only includes dropped counter for XDP_DROP, XDP_ABORTED,
> > > and invalid XDP actions. It would be beneficial to also include new
> > > accounting for successfully received bytes using
> > > dev_sw_netstats_rx_add and introduce new dropped counter for XDP errors
> > on XDP_TX and XDP_REDIRECT.
> > 
> > From the description it is clear that these are two separate changes wrapped
> > into one patch. I should have flagged this previously.
> 
> Do I need to split these two modifications into 2 patches?
> 1. only fix dropped counter
> 2. add new accounting for successfully received bytes
> Or:
> Only fix dropped counter?

It's definitely good to fix both.

It might be a bit pedantic, but two separate patches is more correct.

The second fix, add missing byte counter, goes back to the original
introduction of XDP for tun, so has a different tag:

Fixes: 761876c857cb ("tap: XDP support")

> 
> > 
> > Ack on returning the error counter that was previously present and matches
> > the Fixes tag.
> > 
> > For the second change, I had to check a few other XDP capable drivers to verify
> > that it is indeed common to count such packets.
> > 
> > > Fixes: 8ae1aff0b331 ("tuntap: split out XDP logic")
> > > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > v3: update commit log and code
> > > v2: add Fixes tag
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/tun.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c index
> > > afa5497f7c35..0704a17e74e1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > > @@ -1625,18 +1625,15 @@ static struct sk_buff *__tun_build_skb(struct
> > > tun_file *tfile,  static int tun_xdp_act(struct tun_struct *tun, struct
> > bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
> > >  		       struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 act)  {
> > > -	int err;
> > > +	unsigned int datasize = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
> > > +	int err = 0;
> > >
> > >  	switch (act) {
> > >  	case XDP_REDIRECT:
> > >  		err = xdp_do_redirect(tun->dev, xdp, xdp_prog);
> > > -		if (err)
> > > -			return err;
> > >  		break;
> > >  	case XDP_TX:
> > >  		err = tun_xdp_tx(tun->dev, xdp);
> > > -		if (err < 0)
> > > -			return err;
> > >  		break;
> > >  	case XDP_PASS:
> > >  		break;
> > > @@ -1651,6 +1648,13 @@ static int tun_xdp_act(struct tun_struct *tun,
> > struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
> > >  		break;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > > +	if (err < 0) {
> > > +		act = err;
> > > +		dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(tun->dev);
> > > +	} else if (act == XDP_REDIRECT || act == XDP_TX) {
> > > +		dev_sw_netstats_rx_add(tun->dev, datasize);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > 
> > Let's avoid adding yet another branch and just do these operations in the case
> > statements, like XDP_DROP.
> 
> Fix it like this?

Perhaps avoid computing datasize is all paths, when it is not used
in common XDP_PASS, high performance XDP_DROP and a few others. Not
sure whether (all) compilers would optimze that.

        dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(tun->dev, xdp,
                                      xdp->data_end - xdp->data);


> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1625,18 +1625,25 @@ static struct sk_buff *__tun_build_skb(struct tun_file *tfile,
>  static int tun_xdp_act(struct tun_struct *tun, struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
>                        struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 act)
>  {
> +       unsigned int datasize = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
>         int err;
>  
>         switch (act) {
>         case XDP_REDIRECT:
>                 err = xdp_do_redirect(tun->dev, xdp, xdp_prog);
> -               if (err)
> +               if (err) {
> +                       dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(tun->dev);
>                         return err;
> +               }
> +               dev_sw_netstats_rx_add(tun->dev, datasize);
>                 break;
>         case XDP_TX:
>                 err = tun_xdp_tx(tun->dev, xdp);
> -               if (err < 0)
> +               if (err < 0) {
> +                       dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(tun->dev);
>                         return err;
> +               }
> +               dev_sw_netstats_rx_add(tun->dev, datasize);
>                 break;
>         case XDP_PASS:
> 
> > 
> > >  	return act;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.41.0
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-18 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-17 11:21 [PATCH net v3] tun: add missing rx stats accounting in tun_xdp_act Yunjian Wang
2024-01-17 15:42 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-01-18 12:55   ` wangyunjian
2024-01-18 14:44     ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2024-01-19  8:07       ` wangyunjian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65a9393d75353_1c8cde294e2@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangyunjian@huawei.com \
    --cc=xudingke@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).