netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	 Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	 Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org,  eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/9]  inet_diag: remove three mutexes in diag dumps
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:05:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65ae844c2d5df_308772946c@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122112603.3270097-1-edumazet@google.com>

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Surprisingly, inet_diag operations are serialized over a stack
> of three mutexes, giving legacy /proc based files an unfair
> advantage on modern hosts.
> 
> This series removes all of them, making inet_diag operations
> (eg iproute2/ss) fully parallel.
> 
> 1-2) Two first patches are adding data-race annotations
>      and can be backported to stable kernels.
> 
> 3-4) inet_diag_table_mutex can be replaced with RCU protection,
>      if we add corresponding protection against module unload.
> 
> 5-7) sock_diag_table_mutex can be replaced with RCU protection,
>      if we add corresponding protection against module unload.
> 
>  8)  sock_diag_mutex is removed, as the old bug it was
>      working around has been fixed more elegantly.
> 
>  9)  inet_diag_dump_icsk() can skip over empty buckets to reduce
>      spinlock contention.
> 
> Eric Dumazet (9):
>   sock_diag: annotate data-races around sock_diag_handlers[family]
>   inet_diag: annotate data-races around inet_diag_table[]
>   inet_diag: add module pointer to "struct inet_diag_handler"
>   inet_diag: allow concurrent operations
>   sock_diag: add module pointer to "struct sock_diag_handler"
>   sock_diag: allow concurrent operations
>   sock_diag: allow concurrent operation in sock_diag_rcv_msg()
>   sock_diag: remove sock_diag_mutex
>   inet_diag: skip over empty buckets

For the series:

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-22 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-22 11:25 [PATCH net-next 0/9] inet_diag: remove three mutexes in diag dumps Eric Dumazet
2024-01-22 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] sock_diag: annotate data-races around sock_diag_handlers[family] Eric Dumazet
2024-01-22 16:29   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-01-22 22:36   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-22 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] inet_diag: annotate data-races around inet_diag_table[] Eric Dumazet
2024-01-22 16:29   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-01-22 22:37   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-22 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] inet_diag: add module pointer to "struct inet_diag_handler" Eric Dumazet
2024-01-22 16:58   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-01-22 22:38   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-22 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] inet_diag: allow concurrent operations Eric Dumazet
2024-01-22 16:58   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-01-22 22:40   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-22 11:25 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] sock_diag: add module pointer to "struct sock_diag_handler" Eric Dumazet
2024-01-22 17:24   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-01-22 22:44   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-22 11:26 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] sock_diag: allow concurrent operations Eric Dumazet
2024-01-22 17:25   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-01-22 22:47   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-22 11:26 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] sock_diag: allow concurrent operation in sock_diag_rcv_msg() Eric Dumazet
2024-01-22 17:25   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-01-22 22:51   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-22 11:26 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] sock_diag: remove sock_diag_mutex Eric Dumazet
2024-01-22 21:38   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-01-22 22:55   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-22 11:26 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] inet_diag: skip over empty buckets Eric Dumazet
2024-01-22 21:44   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-01-22 22:58   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-22 15:05 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2024-01-23 14:40 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] inet_diag: remove three mutexes in diag dumps patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65ae844c2d5df_308772946c@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).