From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/core/dev.c: enable timestamp static key if CPU isolation is configured
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:42:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65d795888e904_2c3076294d2@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZdeJyxiTSKtkpHMO@tpad>
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:11:08AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > For systems that use CPU isolation (via nohz_full), creating or destroying
> > > a socket with timestamping (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW) might cause a
> > > static key to be enabled/disabled. This in turn causes undesired
> > > IPIs to isolated CPUs.
> >
> > This refers to SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, not SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW.
> > See also sock_set_timestamping.
>
> Willem,
>
> This test program does trigger the static key change:
>
> int main (void)
> {
> int option = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW;
> int sock_fd;
> int ret;
> int pid_fd;
> pid_t pid;
> char buf[50];
>
> ...
>
> /* set the timestamping option
> * this is to trigger the IPIs that notify all cpus of the change
> */
> if (setsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP, &option, sizeof (option)) < 0) {
> printf("Could not enable timestamping option %x", (unsigned int)option);
> close(sock_fd);
> return 0;
> }
> ...
>
That is because you call SO_TIMESTAMP, which interprets option as a
boolean. The SOF_ flags apply to setsockopt SO_TIMESTAMPING.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 10:35 [PATCH] net/core/dev.c: enable timestamp static key if CPU isolation is configured Marcelo Tosatti
2024-02-22 9:34 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-22 15:11 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-02-22 17:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2024-02-22 18:42 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
[not found] <Zc9493j46rZMRIDv@tpad>
2024-02-16 15:13 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65d795888e904_2c3076294d2@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).