From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 net-next] net/core/dev.c: enable timestamp static key if CPU isolation is configured
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:32:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65df52286736b_7162829478@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zd81gp2utD9+ripX@tpad>
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> For systems that use CPU isolation (via nohz_full), creating or destroying
> a socket with timestamping (SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE and
> SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW) might cause a
Again, SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW is irrelevant here.
See Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst for a definition of the
various flags.
> static key to be enabled/disabled. This in turn causes undesired
> IPIs to isolated CPUs.
>
> So enable the static key unconditionally, if CPU isolation is enabled,
> thus avoiding the IPIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> v2: mention SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW in the commit log (Willem de Bruijn / Paolo Abeni)
I did not suggest that
The subject line is slightly corrupted: net-next -v2
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index c588808be77f..15a32f5900e6 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@
> #include <net/netdev_rx_queue.h>
> #include <net/page_pool/types.h>
> #include <net/page_pool/helpers.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
>
> #include "dev.h"
> #include "net-sysfs.h"
> @@ -11851,3 +11852,14 @@ static int __init net_dev_init(void)
> }
>
> subsys_initcall(net_dev_init);
> +
> +static int __init net_dev_late_init(void)
> +{
> + /* avoid static key IPIs to isolated CPUs */
> + if (housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_MISC))
> + net_enable_timestamp();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +late_initcall(net_dev_late_init);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-28 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-28 13:30 [PATCH -v2 net-next] net/core/dev.c: enable timestamp static key if CPU isolation is configured Marcelo Tosatti
2024-02-28 15:32 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65df52286736b_7162829478@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox