From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)" <quic_abchauha@quicinc.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: kernel@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: Modify mono_delivery_time with clockid_delivery_time
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:14:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65df94185a2c1_b2ad829442@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f38efc6d-20af-4cc1-9b8a-5fcb676b2845@quicinc.com>
Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) wrote:
>
>
> On 2/28/2024 7:53 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Abhishek Chauhan wrote:
> >> Bridge driver today has no support to forward the userspace timestamp
> >> packets and ends up resetting the timestamp. ETF qdisc checks the
> >> packet coming from userspace and encounters to be 0 thereby dropping
> >> time sensitive packets. These changes will allow userspace timestamps
> >> packets to be forwarded from the bridge to NIC drivers.
> >>
> >> Existing functionality of mono_delivery_time is not altered here
> >> instead just extended with userspace tstamp support for bridge
> >> forwarding path.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@quicinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes since v1
> >> - Changed the commit subject as i am modifying the mono_delivery_time
> >> bit with clockid_delivery_time.
> >> - Took care of suggestion mentioned by Willem to use the same bit for
> >> userspace delivery time as there are no conflicts between TCP and
> >> SCM_TXTIME, because explicit cmsg makes no sense for TCP and only
> >> RAW and DGRAM sockets interprets it.
> >
> > The variable rename churn makes it hard to spot the functional
> > changes. Perhaps it makes sense just keep the variable name as is,
> > even though the "mono" is not always technically correct anymore.
> >
>
>
> I think a better approach would be to keep the variable as ease and add
> comments and documentation in the header file of skbuff.h like
> how i have done in this patch. The reason why i say this is
> a. We can avoid alot of code churn just to solve this basic problem of
> propagating timestamp through forwarding bridge path
> b. Re-use the same variable name and have better documentation
> c. Complexity will be as minimal as possible.
>
> Let me know what you think.
Agreed
> > Or else to split into two patches. One that renames the field.
> > And one that adds the new behavior of setting the bit for SO_TXTIME.
> >
>
> Regarding the sidenote. I dont see how they are using clock_id to determine
> if the skb->tstamp is set in monotonic. Please correct me or point me to
> the piece of code which is doing so.
That's really out of scope of this series anyway
>
> I hope the check against sock_flag is a better implementation as
> it clearly stats and is inline with the implementation that the tstamp is
> coming from userspace.
> skb->mono_delivery_time = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TXTIME);
Enabling the socket flag is not sufficient to configure a delivery
time on a packet. A transmit time must be communicated per packet
with cork->transmit_time. And on top of that, it is cheaper to test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-28 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-28 1:12 [PATCH net-next v2] net: Modify mono_delivery_time with clockid_delivery_time Abhishek Chauhan
2024-02-28 15:53 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-02-28 20:03 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-02-28 20:14 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2024-02-28 21:53 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-02-29 0:09 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-02-29 0:13 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-02-29 3:06 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29 14:44 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-02-29 23:00 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-02-29 9:30 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-29 23:15 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-02-29 14:40 ` Andrew Halaney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65df94185a2c1_b2ad829442@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel@quicinc.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_abchauha@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox