From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 3/4] udp: do not transition UDP fraglist to unnecessary checksum
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 16:43:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65fb4a8b1389_1faab3294c8@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <171094732998.5492.6523626232845873652@kwain>
Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Quoting Willem de Bruijn (2024-03-20 14:00:48)
> > Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > > Quoting Willem de Bruijn (2024-03-19 14:38:20)
> > > >
> > > > The original patch converted to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for a reason.
> > > > The skb->csum of the main gso_skb is not valid?
> > > >
> > > > Should instead only the csum_level be adjusted, to always keep
> > > > csum_level == 0?
> > >
> > > The above trace is an ICMPv6 packet being tunneled and GROed at the UDP
> > > level, thus we have:
> > > UDP(CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)/Geneve/ICMPv6(was CHECKSUM_NONE)
> > > csum_level would need to be 1 here; but we can't know that.
> >
> > Is this a packet looped internally? Else it is not CHECKSUM_PARTIAL.
>
> I'm not sure to follow, CHECKSUM_NONE packets going in a tunnel will be
> encapsulated and the outer UDP header will be CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. The
> packet can be looped internally or going to a remote host.
That is on transmit. To come into contact with UDP_GRO while having
CHECKSUM_PARTIAL the packet will have to loop into the receive path,
in some way that triggers GRO. Perhaps through gro_cells, as other
GRO paths are hardware NIC drivers.
> > > There is another issue (no kernel trace): if a packet has partial csum
> > > and is being GROed that information is lost and the packet ends up with
> > > an invalid csum.
> >
> > CHECKSUM_PARTIAL should be converted to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for this
> > reason. CHECKSUM_PARTIAL implies the header is prepared with pseudo
> > header checksum. Similarly CHECKSUM_COMPLETE implies skb csum is valid.
> > CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY has neither expectations.
>
> But not if the packet is sent to a remote host. Otherwise an inner
> partial csum is never fixed by the stack/NIC before going out.
The stack will only offload a single checksum. With local checksum
offload, this can be the inner checksum and the outer can be cheaply
computed in software. udp_set_csum() handles this. It indeed sets lco
if the inner packet has CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. Otherwise it sets ip_summed
to CHECKSUM_PARTIAL, now pointing to the outer UDP header.
You're right. Regardless of whether it points to the inner or outer
checksum, a conversion of CHECKSUM_PARTIAL to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY
will break checksum offload in the forwarding case.
> > > Packets with CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY should end up with the same info. My
> > > impression is this checksum conversion is at best setting the same info
> > > and otherwise is overriding valuable csum information.
> > >
> > > Or would packets with CSUM_NONE being GROed would benefit from the
> > > CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY conversion?
> >
> > Definitely. If the packet has CHECKSUM_NONE and GRO checks its
> > validity in software, converting it to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY avoids
> > potential additional checks at later stages in the packet path.
>
> Makes sense. The current code really looks like
> __skb_incr_checksum_unnecessary, w/o the CHECKSUM_NONE check to only
> convert those packets.
>
> Thanks!
> Antoine
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-20 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-19 9:31 [PATCH net v2 0/4] gro: various fixes related to UDP tunnels Antoine Tenart
2024-03-19 9:31 ` [PATCH net v2 1/4] udp: do not accept non-tunnel GSO skbs landing in a tunnel Antoine Tenart
2024-03-20 2:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-20 11:11 ` Antoine Tenart
2024-03-20 10:34 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2024-03-20 11:13 ` Antoine Tenart
2024-03-19 9:31 ` [PATCH net v2 2/4] gro: fix ownership transfer Antoine Tenart
2024-03-19 13:13 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-19 9:31 ` [PATCH net v2 3/4] udp: do not transition UDP fraglist to unnecessary checksum Antoine Tenart
2024-03-19 13:38 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-19 16:01 ` Antoine Tenart
2024-03-20 13:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-20 15:08 ` Antoine Tenart
2024-03-20 20:43 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2024-03-21 8:48 ` Antoine Tenart
2024-03-21 12:42 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-03-21 14:58 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-21 17:22 ` Antoine Tenart
2024-03-21 18:13 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-22 10:48 ` Antoine Tenart
2024-03-19 9:31 ` [PATCH net v2 4/4] udp: prevent local UDP tunnel packets from being GROed Antoine Tenart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65fb4a8b1389_1faab3294c8@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).