From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: zijianzhang@bytedance.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: edumazet@google.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
cong.wang@bytedance.com, xiaochun.lu@bytedance.com,
Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] selftests: fix OOM problem in msg_zerocopy selftest
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:37:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66816dc388821_e2572949a@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240626193403.3854451-2-zijianzhang@bytedance.com>
zijianzhang@ wrote:
> From: Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@bytedance.com>
>
> In selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c, it has a while loop keeps calling sendmsg
> on a socket with MSG_ZEROCOPY flag, and it will recv the notifications
> until the socket is not writable. Typically, it will start the receiving
> process after around 30+ sendmsgs. However, because of the
> commit dfa2f0483360 ("tcp: get rid of sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale")
> the sender is always writable and does not get any chance to run recv
> notifications. The selftest always exits with OUT_OF_MEMORY because the
> memory used by opt_skb exceeds the core.sysctl_optmem_max.
>
> According to our experiments, this problem can be mitigated by open the
> DEBUG_LOCKDEP configuration for the kernel. But it will makes the
> notifications disordered even in good commits before
> commit dfa2f0483360 ("tcp: get rid of sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale").
Since this is not a real fix, no need to suggest it.
> We introduce "cfg_notification_limit" to force sender to receive
> notifications after some number of sendmsgs. And, notifications may not
> come in order, because of the reason we present above. We have order
> checking code managed by cfg_verbose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zijian Zhang <zijianzhang@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaochun Lu <xiaochun.lu@bytedance.com>
Probably just send this as a separate patch to net-next.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-30 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-26 19:33 [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: A lightweight zero-copy notification zijianzhang
2024-06-26 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] selftests: fix OOM problem in msg_zerocopy selftest zijianzhang
2024-06-30 14:37 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2024-06-26 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/4] sock: support copy cmsg to userspace in TX path zijianzhang
2024-06-27 21:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-28 3:11 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-30 14:43 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-07-01 19:46 ` [External] " Zijian Zhang
2024-07-03 0:10 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-06-26 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/4] sock: add MSG_ZEROCOPY notification mechanism based on msg_control zijianzhang
2024-06-30 14:44 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-07-01 19:58 ` Zijian Zhang
2024-06-26 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] selftests: add MSG_ZEROCOPY msg_control notification test zijianzhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66816dc388821_e2572949a@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaochun.lu@bytedance.com \
--cc=zijianzhang@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox