From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: make PHY fixup support always built-in
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 12:39:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66f110ca-3a49-46fe-a996-c5ad477b8f4d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aXM96CNzkiSIPukf@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On 1/23/2026 10:22 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 07:50:20AM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> PHY fixup registration is used from platform code in init phase only.
>> Let's move the PHY fixup code from the modular part of phylib to the
>> always built-in part of phylib. This allows to annotate the fixup
>> registration as __init.
>>
>> phy_needs_fixup() and phy_scan_fixups() wouldn't have to be moved to
>> the built-in part of phylib. But doing so allows to fully factor out
>> fixup support into its own source code file, and make struct
>> phy_fixup and phy_fixup_list strictly private to phy_fixup.c.
>>
>> phy_scan_fixups() is used after init phase only, then phy_fixup_list
>> is read-only. So we don't need the mutex when accessing the list.
>> Also when registering PHY fixups the mutex isn't needed, because
>> fixup registration is done sequentially from platform init code.
>> Actually there is only one platform with more than one fixup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>
> What is broken today that needs this change, and why haven't we had
> reports of breakage?
>
Nothing is broken, otherwise patch would have been addressed to net tree.
Recent removal of the dnet driver removed last fixup user not being
platform init code. This (and considering that PHY fixups are a legacy
functionality) allows to:
- factor out this legacy functionality from phy_device.c
- discard half the related code after init phase
- simplify the code (e.g. remove mutex)
- use modular phylib on platforms where fixup just sets a flag,
e.g. apx4devkit_phy_fixup() in arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-23 6:50 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: make PHY fixup support always built-in Heiner Kallweit
2026-01-23 9:22 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-01-23 11:39 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2026-01-25 19:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-25 20:05 ` Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66f110ca-3a49-46fe-a996-c5ad477b8f4d@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox