From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@chelsio.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Geetha sowjanya <gakula@marvell.com>,
hariprasad <hkelam@marvell.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Louis Peens <louis.peens@corigine.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@corigine.com,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 4/5] xfrm: provide common xdo_dev_offload_ok callback implementation
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 13:36:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6775786f-ee86-4990-8db8-ea95d4313973@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250216110711.GU17863@unreal>
在 2025/2/16 12:07, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 10:33:59AM +0100, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>> 在 2025/2/5 19:20, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
>>> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> Almost all drivers except bond and nsim had same check if device
>>> can perform XFRM offload on that specific packet. The check was that
>>> packet doesn't have IPv4 options and IPv6 extensions.
>>>
>>> In NIC drivers, the IPv4 HELEN comparison was slightly different, but
>>> the intent was to check for the same conditions. So let's chose more
>>> strict variant as a common base.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst | 3 ++-
>>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 16 +++++---------
>>> .../net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c | 21 -------------------
>>> .../inline_crypto/ch_ipsec/chcr_ipsec.c | 16 --------------
>>> .../net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c | 21 -------------------
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ipsec.c | 21 -------------------
>>> .../marvell/octeontx2/nic/cn10k_ipsec.c | 15 -------------
>>> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c | 16 --------------
>>> .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/crypto/ipsec.c | 11 ----------
>>> drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c | 11 ----------
>>> drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h | 1 -
>>> net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 15 +++++++++++++
>>> 12 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst b/Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst
>>> index 66f6e9a9b59a..39bb98939d1f 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst
>>> @@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ been setup for offload, it first calls into xdo_dev_offload_ok() with
>>> the skb and the intended offload state to ask the driver if the offload
>>> will serviceable. This can check the packet information to be sure the
>>> offload can be supported (e.g. IPv4 or IPv6, no IPv4 options, etc) and
>>> -return true of false to signify its support.
>>> +return true of false to signify its support. In case driver doesn't implement
>> In this commit, remove the functions cxgb4_ipsec_offload_ok,
>> ch_ipsec_offload_ok, ixgbe_ipsec_offload_ok, ixgbevf_ipsec_offload_ok,
>> cn10k_ipsec_offload_ok, mlx5e_ipsec_offload_ok, nfp_net_ipsec_offload_ok and
>> nsim_ipsec_offload_ok, use the function xfrm_dev_offload_ok to do the same
>> work.
>>
>> But in the file xfrm_device.rst, "return true or false to signify its
>> support"?
> This sentence continued in the xfrm_device.rst: "... In case driver doesn't implement
> this callback, the stack provides reasonable defaults."
Got it.
I mean "... and return true of false to signify its support..."
^^
should be "... and return true or false to signify its support..."
^_^
Zhu Yanjun
>
>> of --> should be "or"
>>
>> Thanks a lot.
>> Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
> Thanks
>
>> Zhu Yanjun
>>
>>> +this callback, the stack provides reasonable defaults.
>>> Crypto offload mode:
>>> When ready to send, the driver needs to inspect the Tx packet for the
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> index e45bba240cbc..bfb55c23380b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> @@ -676,22 +676,16 @@ static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
>>> static bool bond_ipsec_offload_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *xs)
--
Best Regards,
Yanjun.Zhu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-16 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 18:20 [PATCH ipsec-next 0/5] Support PTMU in tunnel mode for packet offload Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-05 18:20 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 1/5] xfrm: delay initialization of offload path till its actually requested Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-06 8:46 ` Bharat Bhushan
2025-02-06 8:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-06 13:59 ` Bharat Bhushan
2025-02-06 14:26 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-05 18:20 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 2/5] xfrm: simplify SA initialization routine Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-12 11:56 ` Steffen Klassert
2025-02-12 18:30 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-14 9:29 ` Steffen Klassert
2025-02-14 11:14 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-05 18:20 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 3/5] xfrm: rely on XFRM offload Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-18 20:39 ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-02-05 18:20 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 4/5] xfrm: provide common xdo_dev_offload_ok callback implementation Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-16 9:33 ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-02-16 11:07 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-16 12:36 ` Zhu Yanjun [this message]
2025-02-05 18:20 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 5/5] xfrm: check for PMTU in tunnel mode for packet offload Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6775786f-ee86-4990-8db8-ea95d4313973@linux.dev \
--to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ayush.sawal@chelsio.com \
--cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
--cc=bharat@chelsio.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
--cc=ilia.lin@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=louis.peens@corigine.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@corigine.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).