From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
"Clark Wang (OSS)" <xiaoning.wang@oss.nxp.com>,
"Frank.Sae@motor-comm.com" <Frank.Sae@motor-comm.com>,
"hkallweit1@gmail.com" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"linux@armlinux.org.uk" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: motorcomm: read EEE abilities in yt8521_get_features()
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 16:32:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <677882ca-16cb-4fd7-86d9-b00d62147bf9@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <GV2PR04MB12213F4758648CD71F5D5B3B7F3F62@GV2PR04MB12213.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 08:16:13AM +0000, Clark Wang wrote:
> > > In phy_probe(), genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities() is only called when a
> > > driver uses phydrv->features. Drivers that implement .get_features are
> > > responsible for reading the EEE abilities themselves.
> > >
> > > yt8521_get_features() does not do this, so phydev->supported_eee stays
> > > empty for YT8521/YT8531S and "ethtool --show-eee" reports "EEE status:
> > > not supported", even though the PHY has the standard EEE capability
> > > registers.
> > >
> > > Call genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities() at the end of
> > > yt8521_get_features() to populate supported_eee.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 70479a40954c ("net: phy: Add driver for Motorcomm yt8521
> > > gigabit ethernet phy")
> > > Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/phy/motorcomm.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/motorcomm.c
> > b/drivers/net/phy/motorcomm.c
> > > index b49897500a59..46efa3406841 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/motorcomm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/motorcomm.c
> > > @@ -2439,6 +2439,9 @@ static int yt8521_get_features(struct phy_device
> > *phydev)
> > > /* add fiber's features to phydev->supported */
> > > yt8521_prepare_fiber_features(phydev, phydev->supported);
> > > }
> > > +
> > > + genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities(phydev);
> >
> > Don't you want to return error if genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities() fails?
>
> EEE is an optional functionality, and the call in genphy_read_abilities() has the following comment. Therefore, I do not return its error here either.
> "
> /* This is optional functionality. If not supported, we may get an error
> * which should be ignored.
> */
> "
This conversation then raises the question, should this be a void
function?
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 7:57 [PATCH net] net: phy: motorcomm: read EEE abilities in yt8521_get_features() xiaoning.wang
2026-07-01 8:11 ` Breno Leitao
2026-07-01 8:16 ` Clark Wang
2026-07-01 8:19 ` Breno Leitao
2026-07-01 14:32 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=677882ca-16cb-4fd7-86d9-b00d62147bf9@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=Frank.Sae@motor-comm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox