Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
	 davem@davemloft.net,  edumazet@google.com,  kuba@kernel.org,
	 pabeni@redhat.com,  dsahern@kernel.org,
	 willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,  willemb@google.com,
	 ast@kernel.org,  daniel@iogearbox.net,  andrii@kernel.org,
	 martin.lau@linux.dev,  eddyz87@gmail.com,  song@kernel.org,
	 yonghong.song@linux.dev,  john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	 kpsingh@kernel.org,  sdf@fomichev.me,  haoluo@google.com,
	 jolsa@kernel.org,  horms@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org,  netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 12/12] selftests/bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for timestamping feature
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 10:54:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67a389af981b0_14e0832949d@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204183024.87508-13-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

Jason Xing wrote:
> Bpf prog calculates a couple of latency delta between each tx points
> which SO_TIMESTAMPING feature has already implemented. It can be used
> in the real world to diagnose the behaviour in the tx path.
> 
> Also, check the safety issues by accessing a few bpf calls in
> bpf_test_access_bpf_calls().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

> +static bool bpf_test_delay(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops, const struct sock *sk)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *skops_kern;
> +	u64 timestamp = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
> +	struct skb_shared_info *shinfo;
> +	struct delay_info dinfo = {0};
> +	struct sk_tskey key = {0};
> +	struct delay_info *val;
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	struct sk_stg *stg;
> +	u64 prior_ts, delay;
> +
> +	if (bpf_test_access_bpf_calls(skops, sk))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	skops_kern = bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(skops);
> +	skb = skops_kern->skb;
> +	shinfo = bpf_core_cast(skb->head + skb->end, struct skb_shared_info);
> +	key.tskey = shinfo->tskey;
> +	if (!key.tskey)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	key.cookie = bpf_get_socket_cookie(skops);
> +	if (!key.cookie)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (skops->op == BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SND_CB) {
> +		stg = bpf_sk_storage_get(&sk_stg_map, (void *)sk, 0, 0);
> +		if (!stg)
> +			return false;
> +		dinfo.sendmsg_ns = stg->sendmsg_ns;
> +		bpf_map_update_elem(&time_map, &key, &dinfo, BPF_ANY);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&time_map, &key);
> +	if (!val)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	switch (skops->op) {
> +	case BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SCHED_OPT_CB:
> +		delay = val->sched_delay = timestamp - val->sendmsg_ns;
> +		break;

For a test this is fine. But just a reminder that in general a packet
may pass through multiple qdiscs. For instance with bonding or tunnel
virtual devices in the egress path.

> +	case BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SW_OPT_CB:
> +		prior_ts = val->sched_delay + val->sendmsg_ns;
> +		delay = val->sw_snd_delay = timestamp - prior_ts;
> +		break;
> +	case BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB:
> +		prior_ts = val->sw_snd_delay + val->sched_delay + val->sendmsg_ns;
> +		delay = val->ack_delay = timestamp - prior_ts;
> +		break;

Similar to the above: fine for a test, but in practice be aware that
packets may be resent, in which case an ACK might precede a repeat
SCHED and SND. And erroneous or malicious peers may also just never
send an ACK. So this can never be relied on in production settings,
e.g., as the only signal to clear an entry from a map (as done in the
branch below).

> +	}
> +
> +	if (delay >= delay_tolerance_nsec)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Since it's the last one, remove from the map after latency check */
> +	if (skops->op == BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB)
> +		bpf_map_delete_elem(&time_map, &key);
> +
> +out:
> +	return true;
> +}
> +

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-05 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-04 18:30 [PATCH bpf-next v8 00/12] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Jason Xing
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 01/12] bpf: add support for bpf_setsockopt() Jason Xing
2025-02-05 15:22   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-05 15:34     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-05 20:57       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-05 21:25       ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 02/12] bpf: prepare for timestamping callbacks use Jason Xing
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 03/12] bpf: stop unsafely accessing TCP fields in bpf callbacks Jason Xing
2025-02-05 15:24   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-05 15:35     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 04/12] bpf: stop calling some sock_op BPF CALLs in new timestamping callbacks Jason Xing
2025-02-05 15:26   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-05 15:50     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING Jason Xing
2025-02-05  1:47   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-05  2:40     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-05  3:14       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-05  3:23         ` Jason Xing
2025-02-05  1:50   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-05 15:34   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-05 15:52     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06  8:43     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06 10:22       ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06 16:13       ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-07  0:22         ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 06/12] bpf: support SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED " Jason Xing
2025-02-05 15:36   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-05 15:55     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 07/12] bpf: support sw SCM_TSTAMP_SND " Jason Xing
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 08/12] bpf: support hw " Jason Xing
2025-02-05 15:45   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-05 16:03     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-10 22:39       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-11  0:00         ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 09/12] bpf: support SCM_TSTAMP_ACK " Jason Xing
2025-02-05 15:47   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-05 16:06     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-05 21:25       ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 10/12] bpf: make TCP tx timestamp bpf extension work Jason Xing
2025-02-05  1:57   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-05  2:15     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-05 21:57     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-06  0:12       ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06  0:42         ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06  0:47         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-06  1:05           ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06  2:39             ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06  2:56               ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-06  3:09                 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06  3:25                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-06  3:41                     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06  6:12                       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-06  6:56                         ` Jason Xing
2025-02-07  2:07                           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-07  2:18                             ` Jason Xing
2025-02-07 12:07                               ` Jason Xing
2025-02-08  2:11                                 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-08  6:53                                   ` Jason Xing
2025-02-07 13:34                             ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 11/12] bpf: add a new callback in tcp_tx_timestamp() Jason Xing
2025-02-05  5:28   ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04 18:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 12/12] selftests/bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for timestamping feature Jason Xing
2025-02-05 15:54   ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2025-02-05 16:08     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06  1:28       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-06  2:14         ` Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67a389af981b0_14e0832949d@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox