Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
	 davem@davemloft.net,  edumazet@google.com,  kuba@kernel.org,
	 pabeni@redhat.com,  dsahern@kernel.org,
	 willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,  willemb@google.com,
	 ast@kernel.org,  daniel@iogearbox.net,  andrii@kernel.org,
	 martin.lau@linux.dev,  eddyz87@gmail.com,  song@kernel.org,
	 yonghong.song@linux.dev,  john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	 kpsingh@kernel.org,  sdf@fomichev.me,  haoluo@google.com,
	 jolsa@kernel.org,  shuah@kernel.org,  ykolal@fb.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org,  netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 09/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB callback
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 10:26:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67acbdb3be6b5_1bcd3029470@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250212061855.71154-10-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

Jason Xing wrote:
> Support the ACK case for bpf timestamping.
> 
> Add a new sock_ops callback, BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB. This
> callback will occur at the same timestamping point as the user
> space's SCM_TSTAMP_ACK. The BPF program can use it to get the
> same SCM_TSTAMP_ACK timestamp without modifying the user-space
> application.
> 
> This patch extends txstamp_ack to two bits: 1 stands for
> SO_TIMESTAMPING mode, 2 bpf extension.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/net/tcp.h              | 6 ++++--
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       | 5 +++++
>  net/core/skbuff.c              | 5 ++++-
>  net/dsa/user.c                 | 2 +-
>  net/ipv4/tcp.c                 | 2 +-
>  net/socket.c                   | 2 +-
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
>  7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 0d704bda6c41..aa080f7ccea4 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static void tcp_tx_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct sockcm_cookie *sockc)
>  
>  		sock_tx_timestamp(sk, sockc, &shinfo->tx_flags);
>  		if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_ACK)
> -			tcb->txstamp_ack = 1;
> +			tcb->txstamp_ack = TSTAMP_ACK_SK;

Similar to the BPF code, should this by |= TSTAMP_ACK_SK?

Does not matter in practice if the BPF setter can never precede this.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-12 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-12  6:18 [PATCH bpf-next v10 00/12] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 01/12] bpf: add networking timestamping support to bpf_get/setsockopt() Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 02/12] bpf: prepare the sock_ops ctx and call bpf prog for TX timestamping Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 03/12] bpf: prevent unsafe access to the sock fields in the BPF timestamping callback Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 04/12] bpf: disable unsafe helpers in TX timestamping callbacks Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 06/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SCHED_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 07/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SW_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-12 23:18   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-13  7:24     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 08/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_HW_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-12 23:20   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-13  7:24     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 09/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-12 15:26   ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2025-02-13  0:07     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-13  7:23       ` Jason Xing
2025-02-13 15:09         ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 10/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SND_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 11/12] bpf: support selective sampling for bpf timestamping Jason Xing
2025-02-12 23:49   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-13  7:26     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-12  6:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 12/12] selftests/bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for timestamping feature Jason Xing
2025-02-13  1:08   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-13 11:31     ` Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67acbdb3be6b5_1bcd3029470@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=ykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox