From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Marcus Wichelmann <marcus.wichelmann@hetzner-cloud.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, mykolal@fb.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
hawk@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/6] selftests/bpf: refactor xdp_context_functional test and bpf program
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:23:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67be0aa61e400_25ccfc29426@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efcc6e11-2d3a-489e-80bc-cbc3f72f7afa@hetzner-cloud.de>
Marcus Wichelmann wrote:
> Am 24.02.25 um 16:29 schrieb Marcus Wichelmann:
> > [...]
> > + /* By default, Linux sends IPv6 multicast listener reports which
> > + * interfere with this test. Set the IFF_NOARP flag to ensure
> > + * silence on the interface.
> > + */
> > + SYS(close, "ip link set dev " RX_NAME " arp off");
> > SYS(close, "ip link set dev " RX_NAME " up");
>
> Hm, setting the NOARP flag seems to have not been sufficient to fix the flaky
> test:
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/13507111620/job/37739614229
>
> I was not able to reproduce it locally or with my own CI runs unfortunately, but
> I'll try something else in the next patch version which should definitely stop
> IPv6 multicast listener report packets from messing with the tests.
You probably want to pass nodad to any ip -6 addr add.
This is a common option you'll find in tools/testing/selftests/net.
RFC 3810 section 5.2.13 says
"
For stateless autoconfiguration, as defined in [RFC2462], a node is
required to join several IPv6 multicast groups, in order to perform
Duplicate Address Detection (DAD).
"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 15:29 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] XDP metadata support for tun driver Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/6] net: tun: enable XDP metadata support Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-26 5:50 ` Jason Wang
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/6] net: tun: enable transfer of XDP metadata to skb Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:26 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-26 5:59 ` Jason Wang
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/6] selftests/bpf: move open_tuntap to network helpers Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-26 6:31 ` Jason Wang
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/6] selftests/bpf: refactor xdp_context_functional test and bpf program Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-24 17:12 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-26 15:56 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 15:07 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:23 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2025-02-26 17:39 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:32 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-26 17:14 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/6] selftests/bpf: add test for XDP metadata support in tun driver Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-24 17:14 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-26 18:50 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-26 19:00 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-26 19:29 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/6] selftests/bpf: fix file descriptor assertion in open_tuntap helper Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-25 14:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] XDP metadata support for tun driver Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-25 15:03 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:14 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67be0aa61e400_25ccfc29426@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcus.wichelmann@hetzner-cloud.de \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox