From: Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xs4all.nl>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cyphar@cyphar.com, kuniyu@google.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/4] selftest: Add tests for useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 19:10:19 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68018741.501644.1786727419159@kpc.webmail.kpnmail.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814095511.4e302a24@kernel.org>
> Op 14-08-2026 12:55 EDT schreef Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 08:11:31 -0400 Jori Koolstra wrote:
> > Tests SCM_RIGHTS fd passing on a socket with the new socket option
> > SO_RIGHTS_NOTRUNC turned on. To hook into the security_file_receive()
> > call, BPF is used. The BPF program shares a hashmap with userspace that
> > lists the inos to be blocked (of the receiver tgid).
>
> Sigh. You are ccing netdev@ only on the selftest.
> I think that this is a clear indication that the selftest
> does not belong under tools/testing/selftests/net
Oh no it absolutely should and this series has gone through several iterations
at this point through the netdev list.
Sorry about this, I am abroad and my email provider apparently has some ridiculous
rate limiting for foreign IPs, so I sent the series and only the first 3 got through.[1]
I contacted them and they basically said "screw you." I wanted to attach this message to
the other ones, but apparently that didn't go as intended.
Can this be taken like this, or does it screw with the CI? Basically it was some
minor fixes and everything has been reviewed by Brauner and Iwashima already.
Thanks,
Jori.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/1036785927.390839.1786639504241@kpc.webmail.kpnmail.nl/T/#m4faa7ec5fea0e075b3db9113fa3d9faf7e2cd1d6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 12:11 [PATCH net-next v7 4/4] selftest: Add tests for useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS Jori Koolstra
2026-08-14 16:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-14 17:10 ` Jori Koolstra [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-13 16:28 [PATCH net-next v7 0/4] net: af_unix: " Jori Koolstra
2026-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/4] selftest: Add tests for " Jori Koolstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68018741.501644.1786727419159@kpc.webmail.kpnmail.nl \
--to=jkoolstra@xs4all.nl \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox