netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Oskolkov <posk@posk.io>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 5/7] bpf: add handling of BPF_LWT_REROUTE to lwt_bpf.c
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:58:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <681aca28-b4e5-eb0d-46cd-94db7a2c368c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190212173247.121342-6-posk@google.com>

On 2/12/19 10:32 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> @@ -148,6 +174,87 @@ static int xmit_check_hhlen(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int bpf_lwt_xmit_reroute(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	struct net_device *l3mdev = l3mdev_master_dev_rcu(skb_dst(skb)->dev);
> +	int oif = l3mdev ? l3mdev->ifindex : 0;
> +	struct dst_entry *dst = NULL;
> +	struct sock *sk;
> +	struct net *net;
> +	bool ipv4;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP))
> +		ipv4 = true;
> +	else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
> +		ipv4 = false;
> +	else
> +		return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> +
> +	sk = sk_to_full_sk(skb->sk);
> +	if (sk) {
> +		if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
> +			oif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
> +		net = sock_net(sk);
> +	} else {
> +		net = dev_net(skb_dst(skb)->dev);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ipv4) {
> +		struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> +		struct flowi4 fl4 = {};
> +		struct rtable *rt;
> +
> +		fl4.flowi4_oif = oif;
> +		fl4.flowi4_mark = skb->mark;
> +		fl4.flowi4_uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk);
> +		fl4.flowi4_tos = RT_TOS(iph->tos);
> +		fl4.flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC;
> +		fl4.flowi4_proto = iph->protocol;
> +		fl4.daddr = iph->daddr;
> +		fl4.saddr = iph->saddr;
> +
> +		rt = ip_route_output_key(net, &fl4);
> +		if (IS_ERR(rt) || rt->dst.error)
> +			return -EINVAL;

I think you have a dst leak here if rt is valid but the lookup is a
reject (e.g., unreachable or blackhole).

> +		dst = &rt->dst;
> +	} else {
> +		struct ipv6hdr *iph6 = ipv6_hdr(skb);
> +		struct flowi6 fl6 = {};
> +
> +		fl6.flowi6_oif = oif;
> +		fl6.flowi6_mark = skb->mark;
> +		fl6.flowi6_uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk);
> +		fl6.flowlabel = ip6_flowinfo(iph6);
> +		fl6.flowi6_proto = iph6->nexthdr;
> +		fl6.daddr = iph6->daddr;
> +		fl6.saddr = iph6->saddr;
> +
> +		err = ipv6_stub->ipv6_dst_lookup(net, skb->sk, &dst, &fl6);
> +		if (err || IS_ERR(dst) || dst->error)
> +			return -EINVAL;

same here.

You could check this by adding a route with unreachable as the target in
your tests. Test cleanup and namespace teardown will tell you pretty quick.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-13  2:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-12 17:32 [PATCH bpf-next v10 0/7] bpf: add BPF_LWT_ENCAP_IP option to bpf_lwt_push_encap Peter Oskolkov
2019-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 1/7] bpf: add plumbing for BPF_LWT_ENCAP_IP in bpf_lwt_push_encap Peter Oskolkov
2019-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 2/7] bpf: implement BPF_LWT_ENCAP_IP mode " Peter Oskolkov
2019-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 3/7] bpf: handle GSO " Peter Oskolkov
2019-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 4/7] ipv6_stub: add ipv6_route_input stub/proxy Peter Oskolkov
2019-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 5/7] bpf: add handling of BPF_LWT_REROUTE to lwt_bpf.c Peter Oskolkov
2019-02-13  2:58   ` David Ahern [this message]
2019-02-13 19:57     ` Peter Oskolkov
2019-02-13 20:11       ` David Ahern
2019-02-13 20:41         ` Peter Oskolkov
2019-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 6/7] bpf: sync <kdir>/include/.../bpf.h with tools/include/.../bpf.h Peter Oskolkov
2019-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 7/7] selftests: bpf: add test_lwt_ip_encap selftest Peter Oskolkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=681aca28-b4e5-eb0d-46cd-94db7a2c368c@gmail.com \
    --to=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=posk@google.com \
    --cc=posk@posk.io \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).