From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F8A0253B73 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784900361; cv=none; b=PXHn6N5FL5Eer1cOuaBL7hVpZWImsjSvXSXsGOMmUZObLjsQAfujqefX6IkmRdpwHgsfywE4CgKEJclU5BQ3znnQWIl9QVl/elt5wlVl/dgmHQ6ZPhbPrRAq9/xupDBOcNTCMubJbJKzNA785k7Ro+paHDqgNVWsaDSWIAdJQ1o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784900361; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5utH0BE2xql4iEJ/yNzR9FtJ0P2CM+Lx3uLzNzeeRl0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=OlU/3+Ac9MM8zYnKO9j6kzExKsnRHVfXVmjdPHByvqyUnnlK9LvgZQR+ExSDpAgEeIwORLuYsEXTJUMRqNDmVz/cOJh3/VwUgQ52zTRx3Ud1JZ/7Z8bYzs07pIXWADRMCLMN/4nA2JcCYHTxRlxX1qoFnYj8q/Uw2/Ddr0M0t2g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MdnV1ZtN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MdnV1ZtN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63DCA1F000E9; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:39:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784900359; bh=EBMn8CBy39FlYb6XGGPYD/sHEEKifs6rIa5P1iFuIRk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=MdnV1ZtNmw//mqVcnI5mG67g5PJTfe1wr5723lxCwdZA1wuL1Gw00gQhybyxPe2/r Uis7y6yGp6SX/IZ58gVJIGcddACsmC5ovsK1bVmMNR3LUyI7s2Q8q6NdLX9hEdYKiA iymAO3BrjS45vUkJDggRi3bv11XkY7k+rPxUpiw3fQTRNKIkG1j8qqk7qsDF25WXJl AwP8uEvyYhP7PzGt6KSSX9auj0mur3uW5gb7h6JLqB1z9efrt0lkrcN/Ytjn9pg+aW YbSltLL3f9t1v5K7AE8Ulg1gOJ9Oz8EMc3G1FWKqYznV0HpN19IdOOYsJg1WisIi7L 5wXSzuQydOpCw== Message-ID: <68b50e02-c238-48c6-b2aa-98eb21077329@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:39:15 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] docs: netdev: clarify expected interactions with LLMs Content-Language: fr To: Jakub Raczynski , Paolo Abeni Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Simon Horman , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan References: <83360de7addb13a3b5f4d5e722148f248fdb2ae0.1784884817.git.pabeni@redhat.com> From: Matthieu Baerts Autocrypt: addr=matttbe@kernel.org; keydata= xsFNBFXj+ekBEADxVr99p2guPcqHFeI/JcFxls6KibzyZD5TQTyfuYlzEp7C7A9swoK5iCvf YBNdx5Xl74NLSgx6y/1NiMQGuKeu+2BmtnkiGxBNanfXcnl4L4Lzz+iXBvvbtCbynnnqDDqU c7SPFMpMesgpcu1xFt0F6bcxE+0ojRtSCZ5HDElKlHJNYtD1uwY4UYVGWUGCF/+cY1YLmtfb WdNb/SFo+Mp0HItfBC12qtDIXYvbfNUGVnA5jXeWMEyYhSNktLnpDL2gBUCsdbkov5VjiOX7 CRTkX0UgNWRjyFZwThaZADEvAOo12M5uSBk7h07yJ97gqvBtcx45IsJwfUJE4hy8qZqsA62A nTRflBvp647IXAiCcwWsEgE5AXKwA3aL6dcpVR17JXJ6nwHHnslVi8WesiqzUI9sbO/hXeXw TDSB+YhErbNOxvHqCzZEnGAAFf6ges26fRVyuU119AzO40sjdLV0l6LE7GshddyazWZf0iac nEhX9NKxGnuhMu5SXmo2poIQttJuYAvTVUNwQVEx/0yY5xmiuyqvXa+XT7NKJkOZSiAPlNt6 VffjgOP62S7M9wDShUghN3F7CPOrrRsOHWO/l6I/qJdUMW+MHSFYPfYiFXoLUZyPvNVCYSgs 3oQaFhHapq1f345XBtfG3fOYp1K2wTXd4ThFraTLl8PHxCn4ywARAQABzSRNYXR0aGlldSBC YWVydHMgPG1hdHR0YmVAa2VybmVsLm9yZz7CwZEEEwEIADsCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYC AwECHgECF4AWIQToy4X3aHcFem4n93r2t4JPQmmgcwUCZUDpDAIZAQAKCRD2t4JPQmmgcz33 EACjROM3nj9FGclR5AlyPUbAq/txEX7E0EFQCDtdLPrjBcLAoaYJIQUV8IDCcPjZMJy2ADp7 /zSwYba2rE2C9vRgjXZJNt21mySvKnnkPbNQGkNRl3TZAinO1Ddq3fp2c/GmYaW1NWFSfOmw MvB5CJaN0UK5l0/drnaA6Hxsu62V5UnpvxWgexqDuo0wfpEeP1PEqMNzyiVPvJ8bJxgM8qoC cpXLp1Rq/jq7pbUycY8GeYw2j+FVZJHlhL0w0Zm9CFHThHxRAm1tsIPc+oTorx7haXP+nN0J iqBXVAxLK2KxrHtMygim50xk2QpUotWYfZpRRv8dMygEPIB3f1Vi5JMwP4M47NZNdpqVkHrm jvcNuLfDgf/vqUvuXs2eA2/BkIHcOuAAbsvreX1WX1rTHmx5ud3OhsWQQRVL2rt+0p1DpROI 3Ob8F78W5rKr4HYvjX2Inpy3WahAm7FzUY184OyfPO/2zadKCqg8n01mWA9PXxs84bFEV2mP VzC5j6K8U3RNA6cb9bpE5bzXut6T2gxj6j+7TsgMQFhbyH/tZgpDjWvAiPZHb3sV29t8XaOF BwzqiI2AEkiWMySiHwCCMsIH9WUH7r7vpwROko89Tk+InpEbiphPjd7qAkyJ+tNIEWd1+MlX ZPtOaFLVHhLQ3PLFLkrU3+Yi3tXqpvLE3gO3LM7BTQRV4/npARAA5+u/Sx1n9anIqcgHpA7l 5SUCP1e/qF7n5DK8LiM10gYglgY0XHOBi0S7vHppH8hrtpizx+7t5DBdPJgVtR6SilyK0/mp 9nWHDhc9rwU3KmHYgFFsnX58eEmZxz2qsIY8juFor5r7kpcM5dRR9aB+HjlOOJJgyDxcJTwM 1ey4L/79P72wuXRhMibN14SX6TZzf+/XIOrM6TsULVJEIv1+NdczQbs6pBTpEK/G2apME7vf mjTsZU26Ezn+LDMX16lHTmIJi7Hlh7eifCGGM+g/AlDV6aWKFS+sBbwy+YoS0Zc3Yz8zrdbi Kzn3kbKd+99//mysSVsHaekQYyVvO0KD2KPKBs1S/ImrBb6XecqxGy/y/3HWHdngGEY2v2IP Qox7mAPznyKyXEfG+0rrVseZSEssKmY01IsgwwbmN9ZcqUKYNhjv67WMX7tNwiVbSrGLZoqf Xlgw4aAdnIMQyTW8nE6hH/Iwqay4S2str4HZtWwyWLitk7N+e+vxuK5qto4AxtB7VdimvKUs x6kQO5F3YWcC3vCXCgPwyV8133+fIR2L81R1L1q3swaEuh95vWj6iskxeNWSTyFAVKYYVskG V+OTtB71P1XCnb6AJCW9cKpC25+zxQqD2Zy0dK3u2RuKErajKBa/YWzuSaKAOkneFxG3LJIv Hl7iqPF+JDCjB5sAEQEAAcLBXwQYAQIACQUCVeP56QIbDAAKCRD2t4JPQmmgc5VnD/9YgbCr HR1FbMbm7td54UrYvZV/i7m3dIQNXK2e+Cbv5PXf19ce3XluaE+wA8D+vnIW5mbAAiojt3Mb 6p0WJS3QzbObzHNgAp3zy/L4lXwc6WW5vnpWAzqXFHP8D9PTpqvBALbXqL06smP47JqbyQxj Xf7D2rrPeIqbYmVY9da1KzMOVf3gReazYa89zZSdVkMojfWsbq05zwYU+SCWS3NiyF6QghbW voxbFwX1i/0xRwJiX9NNbRj1huVKQuS4W7rbWA87TrVQPXUAdkyd7FRYICNW+0gddysIwPoa KrLfx3Ba6Rpx0JznbrVOtXlihjl4KV8mtOPjYDY9u+8x412xXnlGl6AC4HLu2F3ECkamY4G6 UxejX+E6vW6Xe4n7H+rEX5UFgPRdYkS1TA/X3nMen9bouxNsvIJv7C6adZmMHqu/2azX7S7I vrxxySzOw9GxjoVTuzWMKWpDGP8n71IFeOot8JuPZtJ8omz+DZel+WCNZMVdVNLPOd5frqOv mpz0VhFAlNTjU1Vy0CnuxX3AM51J8dpdNyG0S8rADh6C8AKCDOfUstpq28/6oTaQv7QZdge0 JY6dglzGKnCi/zsmp2+1w559frz4+IC7j/igvJGX4KDDKUs0mlld8J2u2sBXv7CGxdzQoHaz lzVbFe7fduHbABmYz9cefQpO7wDE/Q== Organization: NGI0 Core In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Paolo, Jakub, On 24/07/2026 13:56, Jakub Raczynski wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: >> +both use the Sashiko infrastructure on top of different models. Reviews are >> +available after 24h. Patch authors are expected to proactively look into the >> +AI-generated reviews and handle such feedback as any other kind of review: >> +either debate it or address it. In both cases a reply on the mailing list is >> +expected. >> + > > Would it be reasonable to implement automatic response from Sashiko to > mailing list? Some mailing lists (eg. dri-devel as far as I have seen) post > all replies from Sashiko to thread, which is imo not bad, > although it could be filtered by High/Critical severity. > > What do you think about potential for similar solution on netdev, > since AI review has become 'basic' check in patchwork? I was thinking that too: it would be easier to reply to the comments, and help the authors to remember about them. That will not help to decrease the traffic on the netdev ML, but it is also possible to configure Sashiko to email only the authors: https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/main/docs/configuration.md#email_policytoml >> +Authors are strongly encouraged to run LLM reviews on the posted patches in >> +advance of the actual post. Large series triggering a significant amount of >> +AI-generated feedback will likely get little attention from maintainers and >> +reviewers. If Sashiko emails the list and/or the authors, it would be good if this note is added to the emails, not to push people to abuse the public CI and AI resources. On a similar topic, it might be interesting to mention SUIE and the scoring system. Or mentioning that sending multiple untested versions will move their series to the bottom of the queue. Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.