netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+18b26edb69b2e19f3b33@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	 daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, haoluo@google.com,
	 john.fastabend@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,  sdf@fomichev.me, song@kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,  yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: [syzbot] [bpf?] possible deadlock in bpf_lru_push_free (2)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:26:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69155df5.a70a0220.3124cb.0018.GAE@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    e427054ae7bc Merge branch 'x86-fgraph-bpf-fix-orc-stack-un..
git tree:       bpf
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=136b70b4580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e46b8a1c645465a9
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=18b26edb69b2e19f3b33
compiler:       Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=10013c12580000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=16541c12580000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c1ac942fc5fb/disk-e427054a.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/be05ef12ba31/vmlinux-e427054a.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c75604292a15/bzImage-e427054a.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+18b26edb69b2e19f3b33@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor149/10558 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffe8ffffc41588 (&loc_l->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: bpf_common_lru_push_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:514 [inline]
ffffe8ffffc41588 (&loc_l->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: bpf_lru_push_free+0x33b/0xbb0 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:553

but task is already holding lock:
ffffe8ffffc41588 (&loc_l->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: bpf_common_lru_pop_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:440 [inline]
ffffe8ffffc41588 (&loc_l->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: bpf_lru_pop_free+0x1ab/0x19b0 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:496

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&loc_l->lock);
  lock(&loc_l->lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

3 locks held by syz-executor149/10558:
 #0: ffffffff8df3d620 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8df3d620 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:867 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8df3d620 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_percpu_hash_update+0x2b/0x200 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:2409
 #1: ffffe8ffffc41588 (&loc_l->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: bpf_common_lru_pop_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:440 [inline]
 #1: ffffe8ffffc41588 (&loc_l->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: bpf_lru_pop_free+0x1ab/0x19b0 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:496
 #2: ffffffff8df3d620 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline]
 #2: ffffffff8df3d620 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:867 [inline]
 #2: ffffffff8df3d620 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2074 [inline]
 #2: ffffffff8df3d620 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x186/0x4b0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2116

stack backtrace:


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

             reply	other threads:[~2025-11-13  4:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-13  4:26 syzbot [this message]
2025-11-14  7:08 ` [syzbot] [bpf?] possible deadlock in bpf_lru_push_free (2) Menglong Dong
2025-11-15  2:36   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-15 11:20     ` Menglong Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69155df5.a70a0220.3124cb.0018.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+18b26edb69b2e19f3b33@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).