Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Ferrieux <alexandre.ferrieux@gmail.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mac80211: clip ADDBA instead of bailing out
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:58:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69c63a19-5419-4bbe-858f-6ca100345a28@orange.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250317163902.1893378-2-sashal@kernel.org>

When a Linux Wifi{4,5} device talks to a Wifi6 AP, if the AP proposes a Block
Acknowledgement aggregation size (ADDBA) exceeding its expectations, the code in
mac80211 just bails out, rejecting the aggregation. This yields a big
performance penalty on the ack path, which is observable in comparison with
other OSes (Windows and MacOS) which "play smarter" and accept the proposal with
a "clipped" size.

A typical scenario would be:

  AP -> Device : ADDBA_request(size=256)

Current Linux reaction:

  Device -> AP : ADDBA_reply(failure)

Other OSes reaction:

  Device -> AP : ADDBA_reply(size=64)

Note that the IEEE802.11 standard allows for both reactions, but it sounds
really suboptimal to be bailing out instead of clipping. The patch below does
the latter.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ferrieux <alexandre.ferrieux@gmail.com>
---

diff --git a/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c b/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
index f3fbe5a4395e..264dad847842 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
@@ -317,18 +317,20 @@ void __ieee80211_start_rx_ba_session(struct sta_info *sta,
                max_buf_size = IEEE80211_MAX_AMPDU_BUF_HT;

        /* sanity check for incoming parameters:
-        * check if configuration can support the BA policy
-        * and if buffer size does not exceeds max value */
+        * check if configuration can support the BA policy */
        /* XXX: check own ht delayed BA capability?? */
        if (((ba_policy != 1) &&
-            (!(sta->sta.deflink.ht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_DELAY_BA))) ||
-           (buf_size > max_buf_size)) {
-               status = WLAN_STATUS_INVALID_QOS_PARAM;
+            (!(sta->sta.deflink.ht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_DELAY_BA)))) {
+               status = WLAN_STATUS_INVALID_QOS_PARAM;
                ht_dbg_ratelimited(sta->sdata,
                                   "AddBA Req with bad params from %pM on tid
%u. policy %d, buffer size %d\n",
                                   sta->sta.addr, tid, ba_policy, buf_size);
                goto end;
        }
+       if (buf_size > max_buf_size) {
+         buf_size = max_buf_size ; // Clip instead of bailing out
+       }
+
        /* determine default buffer size */
        if (buf_size == 0)
                buf_size = max_buf_size;


       reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250317163902.1893378-1-sashal@kernel.org>
     [not found] ` <20250317163902.1893378-2-sashal@kernel.org>
2025-03-19 10:58   ` Alexandre Ferrieux [this message]
2025-03-19 13:21     ` [RFC PATCH] mac80211: clip ADDBA instead of bailing out James Prestwood
2025-03-19 14:18       ` alexandre.ferrieux
2025-03-19 14:25         ` James Prestwood
2025-03-19 19:50         ` James Prestwood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69c63a19-5419-4bbe-858f-6ca100345a28@orange.com \
    --to=alexandre.ferrieux@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox