From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: "A. Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>, Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>,
Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fec: support RX flushing via an ethtool private flag
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:10:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69d874a2-dc5e-45c5-8f94-418d5a73e738@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825091908.1362677-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
On 8/25/26 11:19 AM, A. Sverdlin wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
>
> The FEC controller can flush the RX FIFO of an individual receive queue
> through the RX_FLUSHn bits of the FEC_QOS_SCHEME (ENET_QOS) register.
>
> RX flushing prevents frames in the RX FIFO from being blocked. Blocking
> can occur when the frame at the head of the RX FIFO cannot be forwarded
> because the ring it is associated with cannot accept it, i.e. when the
> ring's RxBD[EMPTY] is not set or ENET_RDARn is not set. When RX flushing
> is enabled for a ring, such a blocking frame is flushed (discarded)
> instead of stalling the FIFO and holding up the other rings.
>
> Expose this per-queue capability as a runtime ethtool private flag
> ("rx-flush-qN").
>
> Due to erratum ERR050395 (observed e.g. on i.MX8QXP), enabling RX flushing
> on more than one queue at a time can lock up the receive path, so only a
> single queue may have flushing enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
## Form letter - net-next-closed
net-next pull request for v7.3 has already been merged, and therefore
the net-next tree is closed for new drivers, features, code refactoring
and optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only.
Please repost when net-next reopens after Aug 31st.
RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.
See:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle
--
pw-bot: defer
pv-bot: closed
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 9:19 [PATCH net-next] net: fec: support RX flushing via an ethtool private flag A. Sverdlin
2026-08-25 10:01 ` Wei Fang
2026-08-27 8:10 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69d874a2-dc5e-45c5-8f94-418d5a73e738@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox