From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89828C433F5 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356565AbiDSUHv (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:07:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57654 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1356495AbiDSUHs (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:07:48 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68D40645E; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04CD4616B0; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 018CAC385A7; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1650398703; bh=A2qFOURET0e3VBZ9tKe16pxmX9MhilNw6SAjKsMMhX4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=h54xjPFYQ5UlVjImczhHBaUH3BHuzY7ey1mWTR43wzLoeWrs6AkZCzGqQiC0NluDQ tGFqvAA8lem8JV64LBoXvcAukfPJ/ztdK7I48eWrPuej+kgtQTR8x0FIhhpYve2w65 T1aRBqFXf0UYl3Spgvsd0utJMwUElfwfxT2LboBX6ffvs1+5gaYMFSeYWicSqq6Nwq P+WTUO+WaigptQv1hEFr08nExGCChJcPXBjcsD+kYVd27Y8BX5Ga6iI1crGEmVtuu5 qjdCK3lGUwBSV7Fwvtm20nI+1SgbIm9ttZDS/NgjjhkfHfBTKOOsPWV5hsM+O5Z5it ZiQQWjnnf19eg== Message-ID: <6a9ac38a-5de0-3305-e14b-afd280411dd7@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:04:59 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/ipv6: Enforce limits for accept_unsolicited_na sysctl Content-Language: en-US To: Arun Ajith S , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com References: <20220419105910.686-1-aajith@arista.com> From: David Ahern In-Reply-To: <20220419105910.686-1-aajith@arista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 4/19/22 4:59 AM, Arun Ajith S wrote: > Fix mistake in the original patch where limits were specified but the > handler didn't take care of the limits. > > Signed-off-by: Arun Ajith S > --- > net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > Reviewed-by: David Ahern