From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, nm@ti.com, kristo@kernel.org,
vigneshr@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, srk@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-sk: Add cpsw3g cpts PPS support
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:18:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ae650c9-d68d-d2fc-8319-b7784cd2a749@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230111114429.1297557-6-s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Hi,
On 11/01/2023 13:44, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> The CPTS driver is capable of configuring GENFy (Periodic Signal Generator
> Function) present in the CPTS module, to generate periodic output signals
> with a custom time period. In order to generate a PPS signal on the GENFy
> output, the device-tree property "ti,pps" has to be used. The "ti,pps"
> property is used to declare the mapping between the CPTS HWx_TS_PUSH
> (Hardware Timestamp trigger) input and the GENFy output that is configured
> to generate a PPS signal. The mapping is of the form:
> <x-1 y>
> where the value x corresponds to HWx_TS_PUSH input (1-based indexing) and
> the value y corresponds to GENFy (0-based indexing).
You mean there is no HWx_TX_PUSH0 pin? so user needs to use 0 for HWx_TX_PUSH1 pin?
Can you please define macros for HWx_TS_PUSH and GENFy so we avoid
human error with this different indexing methods?
DT should contain the name exactly in hardware.
So if pin is called HWx_TX_PUSH1 in hardware then DT should contain HWx_TX_PUSH(1).
>
> To verify that the signal is a PPS signal, the GENFy output signal is fed
> into the CPTS HWx_TS_PUSH input, which generates a timestamp event on the
> rising edge of the GENFy signal. The GENFy output signal can be routed to
> the HWx_TS_PUSH input by using the Time Sync Router. This is done by
> mentioning the mapping between the GENFy output and the HWx_TS_PUSH input
> within the "timesync_router" device-tree node.
>
> The Input Sources to the Time Sync Router are documented at: [1]
> The Output Destinations of the Time Sync Router are documented at: [2]
>
> The PPS signal can be verified using testptp and ppstest tools as follows:
> # ./testptp -d /dev/ptp0 -P 1
> pps for system time request okay
> # ./ppstest /dev/pps0
> trying PPS source "/dev/pps0"
> found PPS source "/dev/pps0"
> ok, found 1 source(s), now start fetching data...
> source 0 - assert 48.000000013, sequence: 8 - clear 0.000000000, sequence: 0
> source 0 - assert 49.000000013, sequence: 9 - clear 0.000000000, sequence: 0
> source 0 - assert 50.000000013, sequence: 10 - clear 0.000000000, sequence: 0
>
> Add an example in the device-tree, enabling PPS generation on GENF1. The
> HW3_TS_PUSH Timestamp trigger input is used to verify the PPS signal.
>
> [1]
> Link: https://software-dl.ti.com/tisci/esd/latest/5_soc_doc/am62x/interrupt_cfg.html#timesync-event-router0-interrupt-router-input-sources
> [2]
> Link: https://software-dl.ti.com/tisci/esd/latest/5_soc_doc/am62x/interrupt_cfg.html#timesync-event-router0-interrupt-router-output-destinations
>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts
> index 4f179b146cab..962a922cc94b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts
> @@ -366,6 +366,10 @@ &cpsw3g {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&main_rgmii1_pins_default
> &main_rgmii2_pins_default>;
> +
> + cpts@3d000 {
> + ti,pps = <2 1>;
> + };
> };
>
> &cpsw_port1 {
> @@ -464,3 +468,19 @@ partition@3fc0000 {
> };
> };
> };
> +
> +#define TS_OFFSET(pa, val) (0x4+(pa)*4) (0x10000 | val)
Should this go in ./include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/k3.h ?
That way every board DT file doesn't have to define it.
The name should be made more platform specific.
e.g. K3_TS_OFFSET if it is the same for all K3 platforms.
If not then please add Platform name instead of K3.
> +
> +×ync_router {
> + status = "okay";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&cpsw_cpts>;
> +
> + /* Example of the timesync routing */
> + cpsw_cpts: cpsw-cpts {
> + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> + /* pps [cpsw cpts genf1] in17 -> out12 [cpsw cpts hw3_push] */
> + TS_OFFSET(12, 17)
> + >;
> + };
> +};
cheers,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-13 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-11 11:44 [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add PPS support to am65-cpts driver Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-01-11 11:44 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] dt-binding: net: ti: am65x-cpts: add 'ti,pps' property Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-01-13 19:16 ` Rob Herring
2023-01-11 11:44 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: add pps support Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-01-13 9:57 ` Roger Quadros
2023-01-16 6:23 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-01-11 11:44 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: adjust pps following ptp changes Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-01-11 11:44 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Add timesync router node Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-05-16 13:31 ` Nishanth Menon
2023-01-11 11:44 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-sk: Add cpsw3g cpts PPS support Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-01-13 10:18 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2023-01-16 7:12 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-01-16 16:05 ` Roger Quadros
2023-01-16 16:30 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2023-01-17 5:28 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-01-17 9:30 ` Roger Quadros
2023-01-17 9:39 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-01-13 9:48 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add PPS support to am65-cpts driver Roger Quadros
2023-01-13 9:56 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-01-13 10:21 ` Roger Quadros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ae650c9-d68d-d2fc-8319-b7784cd2a749@kernel.org \
--to=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=srk@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).