From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Norbert Jurkeit <norbert.jurkeit@web.de>,
nic_swsd@realtek.com, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael.wiktowy@gmail.com,
jcline@redhat.com, marc.c.dionne@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Issue with RTL8111 NIC after upgrade to kernel 4.19
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:49:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6aeba3d6-2292-1221-9be7-1c0bb7cbc203@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eda84d0b-2d9f-07ae-34a1-767bc5200964@gmail.com>
On 21.11.2018 21:32, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 21.11.2018 21:20, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> request_module() is supposed to be synchronous, however after some
>>> reading this may not be 100% guaranteed. Maybe the module init
>>> function on some systems isn't finished yet when request_module()
>>> returns. As a result the genphy driver may be used instead of
>>> the PHY version-specific driver.
>>
>> Hi Heiner
>>
>> That would be true for all PHYs i think. We would of noticed this
>> problem with other systems using other PHY drivers.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
> It could be a timing issue affecting certain systems only. At least
> for now I don't have a good explanation why loading the module via
> request_module() and loading it upfront manually makes a difference.
>
> One affected user just reported the PHY to be a RTL8211B. This is
> what I expected, because this PHY crashes when writing to the MMD
> registers (the MMD registers are used otherwise by this PHY).
> See also commit 0231b1a074c6 ("net: phy: realtek: Use the dummy
> stubs for MMD register access for rtl8211b").
>
> Let's see whether the other affected systems use the same PHY
> version.
>
Next report is also about a RTL8211B and as I assumed:
- W/o manually loading the realtek module the genphy driver is used
and network fails.
- W/ manually loading the realtek module the proper RTL8211B PHY
driver is used and network works.
So it seems that even after request_module() the PHY driver isn't
yet available when device and driver are matched.
If further reports support this (pre-)analysis, then indeed it
seems to be a timing issue and a proper fix most likely is
difficult. As a workaround I could imagine to add a delay loop
after request_module() checking for a Realtek PHY driver via
driver_find(). When adding one small delay after this we should
be sufficiently sure that all Realtek PHY drivers are registered.
> Heiner
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-21 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-21 10:51 Issue with RTL8111 NIC after upgrade to kernel 4.19 Norbert Jurkeit
2018-11-21 19:57 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-11-21 20:20 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-11-21 20:32 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-11-21 20:49 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2018-11-21 20:52 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-11-21 21:53 ` Marc Dionne
2018-11-21 22:28 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-11-21 23:13 ` Marc Dionne
2018-11-22 18:17 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-11-22 18:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-11-22 19:48 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-11-22 19:29 ` Marc Dionne
2018-11-22 19:53 ` Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6aeba3d6-2292-1221-9be7-1c0bb7cbc203@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jcline@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.c.dionne@gmail.com \
--cc=michael.wiktowy@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=norbert.jurkeit@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).