From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EBAC282CE for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BF0218A1 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="E/Npk9JL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727733AbfBKVer (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:34:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:43330 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727366AbfBKVeo (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:34:44 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id r2so383511wrv.10 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:34:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BLJsla9dyhCwNffv/lDL9bSPB2UcLnIOfVQFqwacOSA=; b=E/Npk9JLd4z9vLAINnPlqrOa/5anpf8FQat9l4cQB26ILxHv6HjnSaqu7sy9CHPjMR TjYl81oRj1bSDmNpp1w33uxV5fRshZ183kq0X4lMBSHLHtDg+Di/7f8LexTHTB9pbqvy hUf0x9o55vvxOChXBkJRAkf0wzE+xnNNL1w32CEQVN6Xl3QS41h5qFhWYjQVPnU+RYk+ zZgocKBUJQ1WwKm9jnDKlGuzIDLCs154UKy9McV4BtqdrpXpauas+mXibOrwCzW8p/y0 /sU/vNRm586UHMClXXRC6BNu+V2pSswYp+C5P82GzFySf94y0fSY4NgvTHYY6Gmg+mz1 eEyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BLJsla9dyhCwNffv/lDL9bSPB2UcLnIOfVQFqwacOSA=; b=nDgJ8WAYR/+zT/USrQaoPPBprxQZSmBE/qyVPriLfeWcGphZbzpDyyWghhAo8LOveb gMhx1BZWcHQ2FCMtggD2YYHn5YpIa2pOV7XtN/43FKt4kBDGEal7ifCKZEQV8T6DXo5I AWuHc1Md0fcqa0i8tWONbzPvdAfXUTTk18MgHINB+2O+i0TC96h6zdi7ybEAO0V/OJtO F8TkHxxl8h1eviqbY5wg80N8TV215TSbnW+Xu/RZZqqSMAxZ+4CeTtxWdAntWF/Qrxir W7w+6BQ3465Vc7M/ILBv6prk5ixpIdo4WV3iG33jK5nBzQH+VxHVmzXB8bBsWYygpoVW GmlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuauOuLuqCbKoOEGOrKNIY/6g2l51Ae/3NQPtd76Hi2ogyUiRg0E jRNNgvfIVmBxHJpkDieiNWF4VY+D X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Ib7Z7+zzrr7oHbJrJz6TugyELuGZxPaIuLhlTTpORIYjbaASAGkPUG99RvwenPgejA1P7lNTg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f410:: with SMTP id g16mr241731wro.246.1549920882019; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:34:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.85] (p2E55CCEB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [46.85.204.235]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o8sm7289481wrx.15.2019.02.11.13.34.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:34:41 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3 net-next] net: phy: disregard "Clause 22 registers present" bit in get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg To: David Miller Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <75c9d8ee-582f-f247-7595-d8732ac26c20@gmail.com> <20190211.131900.826012556219014471.davem@davemloft.net> From: Heiner Kallweit Message-ID: <6bdfe4da-6c27-c07c-2eb1-0cc13007a6d9@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:34:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190211.131900.826012556219014471.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 11.02.2019 22:19, David Miller wrote: > From: Heiner Kallweit > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 20:19:17 +0100 > >> Bit 0 in register 1.5 doesn't represent a device but is a flag that >> Clause 22 registers are present. Therefore disregard this bit when >> populating the device list. If code needs this information it >> should read register 1.5 directly instead of accessing the device >> list. >> Because this bit doesn't represent a device don't define a >> MDIO_MMD_XYZ constant, just define a MDIO_DEVS_XYZ constant for >> the flag in the device list bitmap. > ... > > This doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, please respin. > You applied v2 already, and with a follow-up patch I "upgraded" it to v3. So you can disregard this series. > Thanks. >