Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>, "Asias He" <asias@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 3/5] vsock: Enforce no-transport invariant for TCP_LISTEN sockets
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:26:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c1516ca-4699-4d9b-af6e-c7762759d495@rbox.co> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <arT3jXoS7OaU6Tsc@sgarzare-redhat>

On 9/24/26 12:17, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 03:18:13PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> ...
>> I've addressed all your other comments for v2 and went through Ashiko's
>> reports (side effects of lockless peer_shutdown write, imperfect
>> no-transport TCP_LISTENER enforcement). I've decided to try the
>> eager-unassign approach. I think/hope this way we sidestep the lockless
>> writes and enforce the invariant without breaking the API, while fixing the
>> bugs.
>>
>> This should probably be RFC, but I'm posting as v3[1] so netdev's LLM can
>> have a go (too). Hope I'm not breaking any workflow. Let me know what you
>> think.
> 
> I think you can add RFC also on a v3 patch, just to make it clear you 
> are not sure it's ready to be merged.
> 
> That said, thanks for that :-) I'll take a look today or next week 
> because I'm off tomorrow.
> 
> I'm just worried it's becoming too big for net. Anyway, I'll comment 
> there.

Yeah, I get it. Would you rather have a single net.git patch[1] for the
original report + keep all the rest for net-next, or do the whole series as
is, but slowly at net-next?

[1]: Basically
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260915-vsock-connect-reset-closing-v2-4-a1d9abb472f7@rbox.co/
+ your comments addressed + addressing one of Sashiko's comments, and
ignoring the transport-reset-surprise one


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-15 13:15 [PATCH net v2 0/5] vsock: Fix connect() races Michal Luczaj
2026-09-15 13:15 ` [PATCH net v2 1/5] vhost/vsock: Fix socket state constant Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 12:28   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-15 13:15 ` [PATCH net v2 2/5] vsock/virtio: Streamline socket reset on transport/PM event Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 12:30   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-22 13:17     ` Michal Luczaj
2026-09-24 10:06       ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-24 21:26         ` Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 23:39   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 13:15 ` [PATCH net v2 3/5] vsock: Enforce no-transport invariant for TCP_LISTEN sockets Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 12:30   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-22 13:18     ` Michal Luczaj
2026-09-24 10:17       ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-24 21:26         ` Michal Luczaj [this message]
2026-09-28 10:31           ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-10-05  7:58             ` Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 23:39   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 13:15 ` [PATCH net v2 4/5] vsock: Do not reset a TCP_CLOSING socket Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 12:30   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-22 13:17     ` Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 23:39   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-15 13:15 ` [PATCH net v2 5/5] vsock: Handle sudden TCP_CLOSE during connect Michal Luczaj
2026-09-16 12:31   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-22 13:18     ` Michal Luczaj
2026-09-28 10:44       ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-09-16 23:39   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6c1516ca-4699-4d9b-af6e-c7762759d495@rbox.co \
    --to=mhal@rbox.co \
    --cc=asias@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox