From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] geneve: convert config to RCU-protected pointer
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 15:15:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c4a0a58-8233-408f-ae6b-c66f38d8f3a9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701120454.3533252-2-edumazet@google.com>
On 7/1/26 2:04 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> @@ -1137,21 +1144,22 @@ static int geneve_sock_add(struct geneve_dev *geneve, bool ipv6)
> static int geneve_open(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct geneve_dev *geneve = netdev_priv(dev);
> - bool dualstack = geneve->cfg.dualstack;
> + const struct geneve_config *cfg = rtnl_dereference(geneve->cfg);
Minor nit only mentioned because a repost is likely needed: here and in
a few other places the variable declaration order is not respected.
[...]
> @@ -1539,28 +1551,36 @@ static int geneve6_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> static netdev_tx_t geneve_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct geneve_dev *geneve = netdev_priv(dev);
> - struct ip_tunnel_info *info = NULL;
> + const struct ip_tunnel_info *info = NULL;
> + const struct geneve_config *cfg;
> int err;
>
> - if (geneve->cfg.collect_md) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + cfg = rcu_dereference(geneve->cfg);
> + if (unlikely(!cfg)) {
I also *think* the conditional is not needed here.
[...]
> @@ -1717,6 +1790,8 @@ static void geneve_setup(struct net_device *dev)
> dev->netdev_ops = &geneve_netdev_ops;
> dev->ethtool_ops = &geneve_ethtool_ops;
> dev->needs_free_netdev = true;
> + dev->priv_destructor = geneve_free_dev;
Both sashikos point out this may cause double free.
Side note: I think that ideally it would be good to break this patch into 2:
- passing an explicit `const struct geneve_config *` argument where needed.
- doing the rcu conversion.
/P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 12:04 [PATCH net-next 0/2] geneve: make geneve_fill_info() RTNL-less Eric Dumazet
2026-07-01 12:04 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] geneve: convert config to RCU-protected pointer Eric Dumazet
2026-07-02 2:49 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-07 13:15 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-07-01 12:04 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] geneve: make geneve_fill_info() RTNL independent Eric Dumazet
2026-07-02 2:50 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c4a0a58-8233-408f-ae6b-c66f38d8f3a9@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox