From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275DFC433EF for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 03:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231484AbiBJDax (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:30:53 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:56396 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229898AbiBJDat (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:30:49 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A146F23BD5; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:30:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id a39so7041770pfx.7; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:30:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AmLyqfUdlL8DhLFGxGUWbqjZWjMo7jccpA1AQzm3NEQ=; b=iMTVcsTiBpdcgE/LXjjjSy9WbEr3RQtlPc14mGvHY8KipI8360dhwh2Bu9pGSdNrGk f5uUflfGWeev1ojIFa7OxtHdZnWEtY3PUZ44BPs/MkEy2LniSd+Ais+/r0ZMdgcHLHGK bTSibGgPe+xucmleAu1TAyDpYtyw6H20nlJBX8hWgvqygH+ZQexf9LLDAKScY5LN604o gz6vASlIW/mZK15So5XVBCMbU2a2IuJfZpC2IiuxYoNzac4cGqrdf69WZCHkfSEj3evR VJeudmoCDUocuwCl6jFh1I9EkHkhNTGMiyo7LofAalaTEHl7Ayqu3/Wi2cUTJhi02Cjw kvFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AmLyqfUdlL8DhLFGxGUWbqjZWjMo7jccpA1AQzm3NEQ=; b=6a00P4sTYZSAIS34y0FtuJwUKiVzJJNLtY8GViOXoz9NBcdRnNs9u50AB/DtpMisjS XtLm1WQMGNruH//bclvR4rIjtwRQ7UvWKxlC9ijR+JqvKIoJ3k77L43CbHExUozS8R4U 75JunipDgY5+NQgGB1xAyjTDD/OPUiwflkzL9fJKFk9jjdzASv2zaWfMRzfmmVBgMXIn rP7ZGQo0fpw9Nv7zaUir4gyFxJXl1nZMIBcjHjQP9Maa7skdRuiLrM6yc7Utyvfr2faq QwWJj6K1AF28GTumSb56SJvhmUQ1dpYAtjlx3U4w3rGHQQIZVsQ3DSeMYCUwj0CPNNyS Fipg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53191gBATiHG2sT9HiNsSnnBqmtqL3VZp1soJ0FxPoEvdTVoiwut dxtAb/Kw8KFYx6Z3EXvU0bY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwr143OVyAx/RUyXpTOD2E0EgWk95VWXJ/HPx31CxiYCtnw5wbPpLyMHoaRRGCKRhw4UzvzzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2c0c:: with SMTP id s12mr4523537pgs.331.1644463851128; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:30:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (ip72-194-116-95.oc.oc.cox.net. [72.194.116.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o21sm22276367pfu.100.2022.02.09.19.30.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:30:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6c74b2f8-dd83-c4f2-cadd-07794a37dfac@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:30:48 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: qca8k: fix noderef.cocci warnings Content-Language: en-US To: kernel test robot , Ansuel Smith Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Memory Management List , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Vladimir Oltean , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <202202100634.l8CtrpzE-lkp@intel.com> <20220209221304.GA17529@d2214a582157> From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: <20220209221304.GA17529@d2214a582157> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 2/9/2022 2:13 PM, kernel test robot wrote: > From: kernel test robot > > drivers/net/dsa/qca8k.c:422:37-43: ERROR: application of sizeof to pointer > > sizeof when applied to a pointer typed expression gives the size of > the pointer > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/noderef.cocci > > Fixes: 90386223f44e ("net: dsa: qca8k: add support for larger read/write size with mgmt Ethernet") > CC: Ansuel Smith > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Signed-off-by: kernel test robot Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli -- Florian