Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c: SMBus ARP support

[Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>]

Hi Heikki,

> Since we use kernel mode device drivers, we need the kernel device
> instances (struct device) that bind to them. If you want to deal with
> user mode drivers then you can always do that with the i2c-dev
> interface, but then you will not be using the kernel drivers such as
> the mctp-i2c.c in this case.

Sure you could - the userspace ARP implementation would be responsible
for binding an existing kernel driver to the newly-allocated dynamic i2c
address - say, through the new_device interface. The choice of driver
would typically depend on the enumerated UDID.

> But just to be clear, this is not only
> about MCTP. The ARP-capable i2c-clients can be anything.

Yes, I'm not just talking about MCTP here either.

> So even if you still want to scan the ARP-devices in user space
> separately, the kernel must enumerate those devices independently in
> any case.
> 
> I should also point out that to my surprise the i2c-dev interface
> (I2C_CHARDEV) isn't always enabled, even when I2C seems to be
> otherwise fully supported in the kernel. We simply can't assume that
> it's always available.

I don't think requiring a specific functionality to be enabled would be
a showstopper for any particular implementation. We need CONFIG_I2C
already, why is CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV any different?

Cheers,


Jeremy