From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet overqueuing and simplify RESPONSE generation
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:39:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d6388c9-cdeb-4b91-b393-125f4a5b7e0c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702144919.172295-5-dhowells@redhat.com>
On 7/2/26 4:49 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Currently, when a CHALLENGE packet comes in, it's queued in an OOB queue on
> the AF_RXRPC socket that generated one of the calls on that connection for
> the application (which might be in userspace) to service. The application
> then picks up the CHALLENGE and requests a RESPONSE packet be generated,
> allowing the app to include app-specific data in it if appropriate. There
> is, however, no actual limit on the capacity of the CHALLENGE queue, and
> this could be abused remotely - and also getting the OOB mechanism right
> has proven tricky.
>
> Further, by analogy with other AFS codebases, it's not actually necessary
> to generate the application data in response to the CHALLENGE. The reason
> I did this was to set the encryption on the app-data to be the same as that
> specified in the CHALLENGE as the server must be able to handle that.
> However, it's sufficient to use the encoding type set in the token that is
> going to be sent to the server; presumably the kerberos server knows that
> the fileserver can handle that type - otherwise why tell the client to use
> it?
>
> With this in mind, make the following changes to the rxrpc server:
>
> (1) Remove the OOB queuing stuff and retire the related CMSG values and
> sockopt.
>
> (2) Revert to making the connection event processor work item parse the
> CHALLENGE and generate the RESPONSE directly.
>
> (3) Add another (optional) parameter that is passed in when an rxrpc
> client call is created and ends up attached to the connection bundle
> and is a user-type key containing the application data.
>
> (4) RESPONSE generation looks at the bundle and if the app-data is there,
> it will include it (if the security class is YFS-RxGK; RxKAD ignores
> it).
>
> (5) The AFS filesystem driver will create an app-data key when it probes a
> fileserver and will attach it to the afs_server struct. This is then
> picked up when a call is made to that server and passed to rxrpc.
>
> (6) Direct userspace users of AF_RXRPC can partake by creating a user-type
> key containing the app-data they want to use and passing its serial ID
> in a CMSG of type RXRPC_RESPONSE_APPDATA in the initial sendmsg() of a
> call.
>
> To support this, I've made a change outside of afs and rxrc:
>
> (7) Add a refcount to the user-type key payload. The problem is that the
> RESPONSE packet generator needs to look at the length of the app-data,
> allocate a buffer for the packet and then copy the app-data in - but
> the RCU read lock cannot be held across the allocation and the key
> might get updated. To get around this, a ref is taken on the payload
> before the allocation and then put afterwards.
>
> (8) Since the DNS resolver makes use of the user-defined type's code, but
> allocates the payload itself, make it initialise the refcount.
>
> Fixes: 5800b1cf3fd8 ("rxrpc: Allow CHALLENGEs to the passed to the app for a RESPONSE")
> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260624163819.3017002-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
> cc: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
> cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org
> cc: stable@kernel.org
> ---
> fs/afs/cm_security.c | 151 ++++++--------
> fs/afs/fs_probe.c | 5 +
> fs/afs/internal.h | 37 ++--
> fs/afs/main.c | 1 -
> fs/afs/rxrpc.c | 39 ++--
> fs/afs/server.c | 2 +-
> include/keys/user-type.h | 2 +
> include/net/af_rxrpc.h | 20 +-
> include/trace/events/afs.h | 1 +
> include/trace/events/rxrpc.h | 2 -
> include/uapi/linux/rxrpc.h | 6 +-
> net/dns_resolver/dns_key.c | 1 +
> net/rxrpc/Makefile | 1 -
> net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c | 49 +----
> net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h | 22 +-
> net/rxrpc/call_object.c | 4 +-
> net/rxrpc/conn_client.c | 2 +
> net/rxrpc/conn_event.c | 68 +-----
> net/rxrpc/key.c | 36 ++++
> net/rxrpc/oob.c | 387 -----------------------------------
> net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c | 84 +-------
> net/rxrpc/rxgk.c | 128 +++---------
> net/rxrpc/rxkad.c | 27 ---
> net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 15 ++
> net/rxrpc/server_key.c | 40 ----
> security/keys/user_defined.c | 23 ++-
> 26 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 915 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 net/rxrpc/oob.c
This is quite big and difficult to review, could you please someout
break it in smaller chunk?
/P
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 14:49 [PATCH net 0/4] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet handling David Howells
2026-07-02 14:49 ` [PATCH net 1/4] afs: Fix NULL deref in afs_deliver_cb_init_call_back_state3() David Howells
2026-07-02 17:31 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2026-07-02 14:49 ` [PATCH net 2/4] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg to not return an error if last packet queued David Howells
2026-07-02 14:49 ` [PATCH net 3/4] afs: Fix UAF when sending a message David Howells
2026-07-03 11:12 ` Marc Dionne
2026-07-02 14:49 ` [PATCH net 4/4] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet overqueuing and simplify RESPONSE generation David Howells
2026-07-09 10:37 ` Simon Horman
2026-07-10 9:39 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d6388c9-cdeb-4b91-b393-125f4a5b7e0c@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox