Re: [net-next v3] idpf: Don't hard code napi_struct size

[Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>]

On 10/4/24 12:54, Joe Damato wrote:
> The sizeof(struct napi_struct) can change. Don't hardcode the size to
> 400 bytes and instead use "sizeof(struct napi_struct)".
> 
> Suggested-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.h | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.h
> index f0537826f840..9c1fe84108ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.h
> @@ -438,7 +438,8 @@ struct idpf_q_vector {
>   	__cacheline_group_end_aligned(cold);
>   };
>   libeth_cacheline_set_assert(struct idpf_q_vector, 112,
> -			    424 + 2 * sizeof(struct dim),
> +			    24 + sizeof(struct napi_struct) +
> +			    2 * sizeof(struct dim),
>   			    8 + sizeof(cpumask_var_t));
>   
>   struct idpf_rx_queue_stats {

@Tony: I'm assuming you want this one to go via your tree first, please 
LMK otherwise.

Thanks,

Paolo