From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc: free order-0 pages through PCP in page_frag_free() Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:44:18 -0800 Message-ID: <6edcec1a-eefa-7861-1af4-cdf7fa45184c@gmail.com> References: <20181105085820.6341-1-aaron.lu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: aaron.lu@intel.com, linux-mm , LKML , Netdev , Andrew Morton , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Eric Dumazet , Tariq Toukan , ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, yoel@kviknet.dk, Mel Gorman , Saeed Mahameed , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , dave.hansen@linux.intel.com To: Alexander Duyck , =?UTF-8?Q?Pawe=c5=82_Staszewski?= Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 11/12/2018 07:30 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > It sounds to me like XDP would probably be your best bet. With that > you could probably get away with smaller ring sizes, higher interrupt > rates, and get the advantage of it batching the Tx without having to > drop packets. Add to this that with XDP (or anything lowering per packet processing costs) you can reduce number of cpus/queues, get better latencies, and bigger TX batches.