From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Amit Shah <aams@amazon.de>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: Remove redundant calls of sk_tx_queue_clear().
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:07:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f77d50f-b658-b751-5ac4-caaf9876f287@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210128021905.57471-1-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
On 1/28/2021 4:19 AM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> The commit 41b14fb8724d ("net: Do not clear the sock TX queue in
> sk_set_socket()") removes sk_tx_queue_clear() from sk_set_socket() and adds
> it instead in sk_alloc() and sk_clone_lock() to fix an issue introduced in
> the commit e022f0b4a03f ("net: Introduce sk_tx_queue_mapping"). On the
> other hand, the original commit had already put sk_tx_queue_clear() in
> sk_prot_alloc(): the callee of sk_alloc() and sk_clone_lock(). Thus
> sk_tx_queue_clear() is called twice in each path.
>
> If we remove sk_tx_queue_clear() in sk_alloc() and sk_clone_lock(), it
> currently works well because (i) sk_tx_queue_mapping is defined between
> sk_dontcopy_begin and sk_dontcopy_end, and (ii) sock_copy() called after
> sk_prot_alloc() in sk_clone_lock() does not overwrite sk_tx_queue_mapping.
> However, if we move sk_tx_queue_mapping out of the no copy area, it
> introduces a bug unintentionally.
>
> Therefore, this patch adds a runtime
compile-time
> check to take care of the order of
> sock_copy() and sk_tx_queue_clear() and removes sk_tx_queue_clear() from
> sk_prot_alloc() so that it does the only allocation and its callers
> initialize fields.
>
> v3:
> * Remove Fixes: tag
> * Add BUILD_BUG_ON
> * Remove sk_tx_queue_clear() from sk_prot_alloc()
> instead of sk_alloc() and sk_clone_lock()
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210127132215.10842-1-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp/
> * Remove Reviewed-by: tag
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210127125018.7059-1-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp/
>
> CC: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
> CC: Boris Pismenny <borisp@mellanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
> ---
> net/core/sock.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index bbcd4b97eddd..cfbd62a5e079 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1657,6 +1657,16 @@ static void sock_copy(struct sock *nsk, const struct sock *osk)
> #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
> void *sptr = nsk->sk_security;
> #endif
> +
> + /* If we move sk_tx_queue_mapping out of the private section,
> + * we must check if sk_tx_queue_clear() is called after
> + * sock_copy() in sk_clone_lock().
> + */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sock, sk_tx_queue_mapping) <
> + offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_begin) ||
> + offsetof(struct sock, sk_tx_queue_mapping) >=
> + offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end));
> +
> memcpy(nsk, osk, offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_begin));
>
> memcpy(&nsk->sk_dontcopy_end, &osk->sk_dontcopy_end,
> @@ -1690,7 +1700,6 @@ static struct sock *sk_prot_alloc(struct proto *prot, gfp_t priority,
>
> if (!try_module_get(prot->owner))
> goto out_free_sec;
> - sk_tx_queue_clear(sk);
> }
>
> return sk;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 2:19 [PATCH v3 net-next] net: Remove redundant calls of sk_tx_queue_clear() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-01-28 11:07 ` Tariq Toukan [this message]
2021-01-28 12:23 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f77d50f-b658-b751-5ac4-caaf9876f287@gmail.com \
--to=ttoukan.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=aams@amazon.de \
--cc=borisp@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).