From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:58:33 -0400 Message-ID: <70133247-4f2f-1563-161e-9c84cb97ed4f@mojatatu.com> References: <2ca4266f-a164-d2ad-37fa-45f7ae354eb8@mojatatu.com> <20170424.163033.797679814568299306.davem@davemloft.net> <20170424.182453.1488000441860994588.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: simon.horman@netronome.com, jiri@resnulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tom@herbertland.com, pablo@netfilter.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f193.google.com ([209.85.223.193]:34735 "EHLO mail-io0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S978537AbdDXW6m (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:58:42 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f193.google.com with SMTP id h41so51786642ioi.1 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:58:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170424.182453.1488000441860994588.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 17-04-24 06:24 PM, David Miller wrote: > > I think we should eat the pain now and use the strict checks > for all new features like this. > > I'm sorry if this makes more work for you, but this is really > how we have to proceed moving forward. > There is no work for me to do in tc if i push this in without the liberal flag i was suggesting. This is more about the next flag change that will fail with older kernels unless the large tc change happens i.e future ones after this kernel patch. cheers, jamal