public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
To: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@gmail.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
	PJ Waskiewicz <pjwaskiewicz@gmail.com>,
	Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@intel.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: TC stats / hw offload question
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 07:39:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <702dd5b7-c6ed-b669-8270-d44f5ff4fb30@mojatatu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11ab2dc0-ec39-18cd-d170-0d5f954198b9@solarflare.com>


On 2019-02-11 6:44 a.m., Edward Cree wrote:

>> Hasnt been necessary thus far.
>> Is your end goal to match and count?
> My end goal is to implement TC offload in some hw we're designing
>   here at Solarflare.  So I'm trying to determine what hardware is
>   expected/required to do.
> It might be possible to design our new hw so that we can attach a
>   counter to every action, if that's what TC wants. 

It makes sense to have a counter on every action - even if it is
for debugging purposes. The two most basic actions are "drop" or
"accept". In TC speak the default action is "classid x:y" which
typically is to select a queue or give the flow some identity
(one should be able to use the same action on h/w ingress as well
to select a rx DMA ring for example, but that seems uncommon).

Note, your counters should also be shareable; example, count all
the drops in one counter across multiple flows as in the following
case where counter index 1 is used.

tc flower match foo action drop index 1
tc flower match bar action drop index 1


>   But since the
>   other vendors don't seem to do that, I wondered if there was a
>   reason, or if perhaps the counter resources (and PCI bw to read
>   them) could be saved if all those separate counters aren't really
>   needed.  

Probably nobody has paid attention or asked as you did.
Will let the h/w folks speak for themselves. My understanding
based on experience is counters are cheap. Most modern NICs
and ASICs have a gazillion of them at their disposal.

> Right now the design we are considering would only count
>   packets as-matched, i.e. before any edits.  That's fine for encap
>   — you can calculate the bytes correction in SW — but not for decap
>   since in principle the length of the RXed outer headers could
>   vary (e.g. you might have IP options there).
>

ok, so not much in terms of other types of actions.
But for abstraction sake maybe use "flowid x:y" and have counters
associated with that. Or even make this optional and only attach
a counter if someone says "action ok" and allow them to specify
the counter index (assuming you architecture has an indexed table
of counters).

cheers,
jamal


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-14 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-05 19:41 TC stats / hw offload question Edward Cree
2019-02-06  2:20 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-02-08 10:26   ` Edward Cree
2019-02-09 17:39     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-02-11 11:44       ` Edward Cree
2019-02-14 12:39         ` Jamal Hadi Salim [this message]
2019-02-14 15:17           ` Andy Gospodarek
2019-02-18 18:56           ` Edward Cree
2019-02-18 19:37             ` Edward Cree
2019-04-24 14:05   ` Edward Cree
2019-04-24 14:11     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-24 15:03       ` Edward Cree
2019-04-25 13:23         ` Edward Cree
2019-04-25 22:33           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 12:13             ` Edward Cree
2019-04-26 12:42               ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-04-26 18:49               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-29 14:11                 ` Edward Cree
2019-04-29 15:21                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-29 16:25                     ` Edward Cree
2019-04-29 19:14                       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=702dd5b7-c6ed-b669-8270-d44f5ff4fb30@mojatatu.com \
    --to=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=anjali.singhai@intel.com \
    --cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
    --cc=gerlitz.or@gmail.com \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pjwaskiewicz@gmail.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox