From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, andy@greyhouse.net,
stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] bond: have random dev address by default instead of zeroes
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:12:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7112.1359047569@death.nxdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359022329-6919-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us>
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
>Makes more sense to have randomly generated address by default than to
>have all zeroes. It also allows user to for example put the bond into
>bridge without need to have any slaves in it.
>
>Also, fix dev_assign_type values on the way.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
This patch appears to provide a random MAC, which is then
replaced with the first slave's MAC at enslavement time. A more in
depth commit message would be helpful here; I presumed from the above
that the bond's MAC was being set to a random MAC and the first slave
behavior was changing, but inspection of the code suggests otherwise.
Does this have any practical change other than permitting
enslavement to a bridge prior to the bond having any slaves?
I also have one code comment, below.
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 564cf42..af3a777 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -1320,14 +1320,14 @@ static void bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>
> /*---------------------------------- IOCTL ----------------------------------*/
>
>-static int bond_sethwaddr(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>- struct net_device *slave_dev)
>+static void bond_set_dev_addr(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>+ struct net_device *slave_dev)
> {
> pr_debug("bond_dev=%p\n", bond_dev);
> pr_debug("slave_dev=%p\n", slave_dev);
> pr_debug("slave_dev->addr_len=%d\n", slave_dev->addr_len);
> memcpy(bond_dev->dev_addr, slave_dev->dev_addr, slave_dev->addr_len);
>- return 0;
>+ bond_dev->addr_assign_type |= NET_ADDR_SET;
This is a bitwise assignment, but addr_assign_type is not a
bitmask. If addr_assign_type is not 0 prior to this, this will create
an illegal value in the field.
-J
> }
>
> static netdev_features_t bond_fix_features(struct net_device *dev,
>@@ -1628,10 +1628,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
>
> /* If this is the first slave, then we need to set the master's hardware
> * address to be the same as the slave's. */
>- if (is_zero_ether_addr(bond->dev->dev_addr))
>- memcpy(bond->dev->dev_addr, slave_dev->dev_addr,
>- slave_dev->addr_len);
>-
>+ if (bond->dev->addr_assign_type != NET_ADDR_SET)
>+ bond_set_dev_addr(bond->dev, slave_dev);
>
> new_slave = kzalloc(sizeof(struct slave), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!new_slave) {
>@@ -2049,11 +2047,11 @@ int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
> if (bond->slave_cnt == 0) {
> bond_set_carrier(bond);
>
>- /* if the last slave was removed, zero the mac address
>- * of the master so it will be set by the application
>- * to the mac address of the first slave
>+ /* If the last slave was removed, set random mac address
>+ * of the master so it will be set by bond_enslave()
>+ * to the mac address of the first slave.
> */
>- memset(bond_dev->dev_addr, 0, bond_dev->addr_len);
>+ eth_hw_addr_random(bond_dev);
>
> if (bond_vlan_used(bond)) {
> pr_warning("%s: Warning: clearing HW address of %s while it still has VLANs.\n",
>@@ -3708,7 +3706,8 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
> break;
> case BOND_SETHWADDR_OLD:
> case SIOCBONDSETHWADDR:
>- res = bond_sethwaddr(bond_dev, slave_dev);
>+ bond_set_dev_addr(bond_dev, slave_dev);
>+ res = 0;
> break;
> case BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD:
> case SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE:
>@@ -4858,6 +4857,11 @@ static int bond_init(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>
> bond_debug_register(bond);
>
>+ /* Ensure valid dev_addr */
>+ if (is_zero_ether_addr(bond_dev->dev_addr) &&
>+ bond_dev->addr_assign_type == NET_ADDR_PERM)
>+ eth_hw_addr_random(bond_dev);
>+
> __hw_addr_init(&bond->mc_list);
> return 0;
> }
>--
>1.8.1
>
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-24 10:12 [patch net-next] bond: have random dev address by default instead of zeroes Jiri Pirko
2013-01-24 14:37 ` Andy Gospodarek
2013-01-24 17:12 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2013-01-24 19:18 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7112.1359047569@death.nxdomain \
--to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).