From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleksandr Natalenko Subject: Re: TCP and BBR: reproducibly low cwnd and bandwidth Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 20:54:47 +0100 Message-ID: <7131594.kGYvpCWkcy@natalenko.name> References: <1697118.nv5eASg0nx@natalenko.name> <1555524.zWX3teDkM3@natalenko.name> <4edcb644-4530-e771-eea7-947ce0ef12ed@applied-asynchrony.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Neal Cardwell , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , Netdev , Yuchung Cheng , Soheil Hassas Yeganeh , Jerry Chu , Eric Dumazet , Dave Taht To: Holger =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Return-path: Received: from vulcan.natalenko.name ([104.207.131.136]:50334 "EHLO vulcan.natalenko.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750838AbeBPTyu (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:54:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4edcb644-4530-e771-eea7-947ce0ef12ed@applied-asynchrony.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi. On p=E1tek 16. =FAnora 2018 18:56:12 CET Holger Hoffst=E4tte wrote: > There is simply no reason why you shouldn't get approx. line rate > (~920+-ish) Mbit over wired 1GBit Ethernet; even my broken 10-year old > Core2Duo laptop can do that. Can you boot with spectre_v2=3Doff and try "= the > simplest case" with the defaults cubic/pfifo_fast? spectre_v2 has terrible > performance impact esp. on small/older processors. Just have tried. No visible difference. > When I last benchmarked full PREEMPT with 4.9.x it was similarly bad and > also had a noticeable network throughput impact even on my i7. >=20 > Also congratulations for being the only other person I know who ever tried > YeAH. :-) Well, according to the git log on tcp_yeah.c and Reported-by tag, I was not= =20 the only one there ;). Regards, Oleksandr