From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Pommnitz Subject: RE: Does tc-prio really work as advertised? Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:28:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <716567.82573.qm@web51408.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from web51408.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.187]:33151 "HELO web51408.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758315AbXK0J2o convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:28:44 -0500 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jarek, iptables chains (this is what I think you are referring to) are not the= issue. This is about the qdisc that sits immediately over the device driver and dec= ides the order waiting packets are sent over the line/air/carrier pigeon/... . My suspicion is that skb->priority used to be set to a value that deriv= ed from the TOS bits. Then something changed and nobody noticed. --=20 =20 Regards =20 Joerg =20 ----- Urspr=FCngliche Mail ---- Von: Jarek Poplawski An: Jarek Poplawski CC: Joerg Pommnitz ; netdev@vger.kernel.org; OLSR d= iscussion and development Gesendet: Dienstag, den 27. November 2007, 07:46:04 Uhr Betreff: Re: Does tc-prio really work as advertised? On 26-11-2007 23:25, Jarek Poplawski wrote: =2E.. > Are you doing this on the same box? I was tracing this long time ago = too, and, if > I didn't miss something, it was about the place! So, as I recall (af= ter finding > some old message) this TOS is considered only for packets going thro= ugh the FORWARD > chain. (But, I haven't checked this at all now, so "no complaints"..= =2E) =2E..Too exactly! Iptables aren't needed for this, so "going through the forward." should be enough... Jarek P. Machen Sie Yahoo! zu Ihrer Startseite. Los geht's:=20 http://de.yahoo.com/set