From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: "William A. Kennington III" <william@wkennington.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>,
Matt Johnston <matt@codeconstruct.com.au>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: mctp i2c: check length before marking flow active
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:03:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73dadef2-4c19-4740-882a-0fcaca6b8bde@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423074741.201460-1-william@wkennington.com>
On 4/23/26 9:46 AM, William A. Kennington III wrote:
> Currently, mctp_i2c_get_tx_flow_state() is called before the packet length
> sanity check. This function marks a new flow as active in the MCTP core.
>
> If the sanity check fails, mctp_i2c_xmit() returns early without calling
> mctp_i2c_lock_nest(). This results in a mismatched locking state: the
> flow is active, but the I2C bus lock was never acquired for it.
>
> When the flow is later released, mctp_i2c_release_flow() will see the
> active state and queue an unlock marker. The TX thread will then
> decrement midev->i2c_lock_count from 0, causing it to underflow to -1.
>
> This underflow permanently breaks the driver's locking logic, allowing
> future transmissions to occur without holding the I2C bus lock, leading
> to bus collisions and potential hardware hangs.
>
> Move the mctp_i2c_get_tx_flow_state() call to after the length sanity
> check to ensure we only transition the flow state if we are actually
> going to proceed with the transmission and locking.
>
> Fixes: f5b8abf9fc3d ("mctp i2c: MCTP I2C binding driver")
> Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <william@wkennington.com>
Note that you should have included Jeremy's ack, and you should have
avoided reposting before the 24h grace period. In this specific case,
you could have avoided a repost entirely
/P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 0:15 [PATCH] mctp i2c: check packet length before marking flow active William A. Kennington III
2026-04-23 3:47 ` Jeremy Kerr
2026-04-23 6:55 ` William A. Kennington III
2026-04-24 4:16 ` Jeremy Kerr
2026-04-23 7:46 ` [PATCH net v2] net: mctp i2c: check " William A. Kennington III
2026-04-28 11:03 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-04-28 11:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73dadef2-4c19-4740-882a-0fcaca6b8bde@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jk@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=william@wkennington.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox