Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] tracing: add __print_sym() to replace __print_symbolic()

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 08:51 +0000, Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
>  - Is it correct that we can assume RCU critical section when in
>    the lookup function? The SKB code currently does, but I may
>    not ever have actually run this code yet.

Well, I could easily answer that myself, and no, it's incorrect.

It'd be really useful though for these lookups to be able to do them
under RCU, so I think I'll fold this?

--- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct trace_eval_map {
 struct trace_sym_def {
 	const char		*system;
 	const char		*symbol_id;
-	/* may return NULL */
+	/* may return NULL, called under rcu_read_lock() */
 	const char *		(*lookup)(unsigned long long);
 	/*
 	 * Must print the list: ', { val, "name"}, ...'
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
@@ -155,11 +155,13 @@ trace_print_sym_seq(struct trace_seq *p, unsigned
long long val,
 	const char *ret = trace_seq_buffer_ptr(p);
 	const char *name;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	name = lookup(val);
 	if (name)
 		trace_seq_puts(p, name);
 	else
 		trace_seq_printf(p, "0x%llx", val);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	trace_seq_putc(p, 0);
 


johannes