From: Dimitri Daskalakis <dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/mlx5e: advertise tcp-data-split support
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 10:32:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74fdc11c-6e2b-48b3-a29b-392faedddc27@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87se2grw3d.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
On 10/8/26 9:33 AM, Björn Töpel wrote:
> Dimitri Daskalakis <dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> From: Dimitri Daskalakis <daskald@meta.com>
>>
>> The ability to set tcp-data-split was introduced in
>> commit 46bcce5dfd33 ("net/mlx5e: Support ethtool tcp-data-split settings")
>> This commit dropped reporting from mlx5e_ethtool_get_ringparam()
>> without explaining why. commit d347b28c492e ("net/mlx5e: Add hds-thresh
>> query support via ethtool") added support for ETHTOOL_RING_USE_HDS_THRS,
>> and modified mlx5e_ethtool_get_ringparam() to report an hds_thresh of 0.
>>
>> Between these two commits, the hds selftest helper _defer_reset_hds()
>> would skip the reset because neither hds-thresh or tcp-data-split was
>> present in the ring config. After the second commit this introduced
>> a KeyError in the hds.set_hds_enable/disable tests.
>>
>> mlx5 couples tcp-data-split with rx-gro-hw. Users can currently disable
>> tcp-data-split then enable HW GRO. The kernel reports tcp-data-split
>> off, but the HW is presumably splitting.
>>
>> Add back tcp-data-split reporting in mlx5e_ethtool_get_ringparam(),
>> and de-feature tcp-data-split disable. Users can either enable it
>> (if HW GRO is enabled), or leave it under driver control.
>>
>> This is not a fix since the feature is still functional with
>> HW GRO enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dimitri Daskalakis <daskald@meta.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Leave kernel_param->tcp_data_split as ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_UNKNOWN if the
>> device does not support HW GRO
>> - Prevent users from disabling tcp-data-split
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260923230521.1267511-1-dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com/
>>
>> hds.py before:
>> # Interface: eth0, driver: mlx5_core
>> TAP version 13
>> 1..13
>> ok 1 hds.get_hds # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> ok 2 hds.get_hds_thresh
>> # Exception while handling defer / cleanup (callback 1 of 1)!
>> ...
>> # Defer Exception| KeyError: 'tcp-data-split'
>> # Defer Exception|
>> not ok 3 hds.set_hds_disable
>> # Exception while handling defer / cleanup (callback 1 of 1)!
>> ...
>> # Defer Exception| KeyError: 'tcp-data-split'
>> # Defer Exception|
>> not ok 4 hds.set_hds_enable
>> ok 5 hds.set_hds_thresh_random # SKIP hds-thresh-max is too small
>> ok 6 hds.set_hds_thresh_zero
>> ok 7 hds.set_hds_thresh_max
>> ok 8 hds.set_hds_thresh_gt
>> ok 9 hds.set_xdp # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> ok 10 hds.enabled_set_xdp # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> ok 11 hds.ioctl # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> ok 12 hds.ioctl_set_xdp # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> ok 13 hds.ioctl_enabled_set_xdp # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>>
>> hds.py after:
>> # Interface: eth0, driver: mlx5_core
>> TAP version 13
>> 1..13
>> ok 1 hds.get_hds # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> ok 2 hds.get_hds_thresh
>> ok 3 hds.set_hds_disable # SKIP disabling of HDS not supported by the device
>> ok 4 hds.set_hds_enable # SKIP disabling of HDS not supported by the device
>> ok 5 hds.set_hds_thresh_random # SKIP hds-thresh-max is too small
>> ok 6 hds.set_hds_thresh_zero
>> ok 7 hds.set_hds_thresh_max
>> ok 8 hds.set_hds_thresh_gt
>> ok 9 hds.set_xdp # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> ok 10 hds.enabled_set_xdp # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> ok 11 hds.ioctl # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> ok 12 hds.ioctl_set_xdp # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> ok 13 hds.ioctl_enabled_set_xdp # SKIP tcp-data-split not supported by device
>> # Totals: pass:4 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:9 error:0
>> ---
>> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> index 261c466a4d36..f08a968acec4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> @@ -378,6 +378,10 @@ void mlx5e_ethtool_get_ringparam(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
>>
>> kernel_param->hds_thresh = 0;
>> kernel_param->hds_thresh_max = 0;
>> +
>> + if (priv->netdev->hw_features & NETIF_F_GRO_HW &&
>> + priv->channels.params.packet_merge.type == MLX5E_PACKET_MERGE_SHAMPO)
>> + kernel_param->tcp_data_split = ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_ENABLED;
>> }
>>
>> static void mlx5e_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
>> @@ -403,9 +407,14 @@ static bool mlx5e_ethtool_set_tcp_data_split(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> + if (tcp_data_split == ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_DISABLED) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
>> + "TCP-data-split can not be disabled");
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* Might need to disable HW-GRO if it was kept on due to hds. */
>> - if (tcp_data_split == ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_DISABLED &&
>> - dev->cfg->hds_config == ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_ENABLED)
>> + if (dev->cfg->hds_config != tcp_data_split)
>> netdev_update_features(priv->netdev);
>
> Not directly related to your change, but is it correct to call
> netdev_update_features() here? What if later changes in set_ringparam()
> fail? Shouldn't the update be done when we know that set_ringparam() is
> successful? Seems like we can get into an inconsistent state?
>
>
> Björn
Good catch! This can cause the kernel/driver to de-sync. I validated this
by setting rx-gro-hw on -> tcp-data-split on -> rx-gro-hw off, then running
`ethtool -G eth0 tcp-data-split auto rx 1`. The driver disables GRO, but
the subsequent mlx5e_ethtool_set_ringparam() fails, so the kernel still
report tcp-data-split as on.
I'll move the netdev_update_features() call to the end of
mlx5e_set_ringparam() to address this.
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 22:59 [PATCH net-next v2] net/mlx5e: advertise tcp-data-split support Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-10-08 16:33 ` Björn Töpel
2026-10-08 17:32 ` Dimitri Daskalakis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74fdc11c-6e2b-48b3-a29b-392faedddc27@gmail.com \
--to=dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noren@nvidia.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox