From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
To: Tonghao Zhang <tonghao@bamaicloud.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Zengbing Tu <tuzengbing@didiglobal.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] net: bonding: add broadcast_neighbor option for 802.3ad
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 12:36:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7522bff2-eba5-40fd-8136-31392dac3e96@blackwall.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8D7575EB8AD0B297+20250514092534.27472-2-tonghao@bamaicloud.com>
On 5/14/25 12:25, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> Stacking technology is a type of technology used to expand ports on
> Ethernet switches. It is widely used as a common access method in
> large-scale Internet data center architectures. Years of practice
> have proved that stacking technology has advantages and disadvantages
> in high-reliability network architecture scenarios. For instance,
> in stacking networking arch, conventional switch system upgrades
> require multiple stacked devices to restart at the same time.
> Therefore, it is inevitable that the business will be interrupted
> for a while. It is for this reason that "no-stacking" in data centers
> has become a trend. Additionally, when the stacking link connecting
> the switches fails or is abnormal, the stack will split. Although it is
> not common, it still happens in actual operation. The problem is that
> after the split, it is equivalent to two switches with the same configuration
> appearing in the network, causing network configuration conflicts and
> ultimately interrupting the services carried by the stacking system.
>
> To improve network stability, "non-stacking" solutions have been increasingly
> adopted, particularly by public cloud providers and tech companies
> like Alibaba, Tencent, and Didi. "non-stacking" is a method of mimicing switch
> stacking that convinces a LACP peer, bonding in this case, connected to a set of
> "non-stacked" switches that all of its ports are connected to a single
> switch (i.e., LACP aggregator), as if those switches were stacked. This
> enables the LACP peer's ports to aggregate together, and requires (a)
> special switch configuration, described in the linked article, and (b)
> modifications to the bonding 802.3ad (LACP) mode to send all ARP / ND
> packets across all ports of the active aggregator.
>
> ----------- -----------
> | switch1 | | switch2 |
> ----------- -----------
> ^ ^
> | |
> -----------------
> | bond4 lacp |
> -----------------
> | |
> | NIC1 | NIC2
> -----------------
> | server |
> -----------------
>
> - https://www.ruijie.com/fr-fr/support/tech-gallery/de-stack-data-center-network-architecture/
>
> Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <tonghao@bamaicloud.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zengbing Tu <tuzengbing@didiglobal.com>
> ---
> Documentation/networking/bonding.rst | 6 ++++
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/net/bond_options.h | 1 +
> include/net/bonding.h | 3 ++
> 5 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250514092534.27472-1-tonghao@bamaicloud.com>
2025-05-14 9:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] net: bonding: add broadcast_neighbor option for 802.3ad Tonghao Zhang
2025-05-14 9:36 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2025-05-14 9:46 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-05-14 9:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/4] net: bonding: add broadcast_neighbor netlink option Tonghao Zhang
2025-05-14 9:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: bonding: send peer notify when failure recovery Tonghao Zhang
2025-05-14 9:39 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-05-14 9:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: bonding: add tracepoint for 802.3ad Tonghao Zhang
2025-05-14 9:39 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-05-15 9:30 ` Jay Vosburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7522bff2-eba5-40fd-8136-31392dac3e96@blackwall.org \
--to=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tonghao@bamaicloud.com \
--cc=tuzengbing@didiglobal.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox