public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
To: Tonghao Zhang <tonghao@bamaicloud.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Zengbing Tu <tuzengbing@didiglobal.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] net: bonding: add broadcast_neighbor option for 802.3ad
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 12:36:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7522bff2-eba5-40fd-8136-31392dac3e96@blackwall.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8D7575EB8AD0B297+20250514092534.27472-2-tonghao@bamaicloud.com>

On 5/14/25 12:25, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> Stacking technology is a type of technology used to expand ports on
> Ethernet switches. It is widely used as a common access method in
> large-scale Internet data center architectures. Years of practice
> have proved that stacking technology has advantages and disadvantages
> in high-reliability network architecture scenarios. For instance,
> in stacking networking arch, conventional switch system upgrades
> require multiple stacked devices to restart at the same time.
> Therefore, it is inevitable that the business will be interrupted
> for a while. It is for this reason that "no-stacking" in data centers
> has become a trend. Additionally, when the stacking link connecting
> the switches fails or is abnormal, the stack will split. Although it is
> not common, it still happens in actual operation. The problem is that
> after the split, it is equivalent to two switches with the same configuration
> appearing in the network, causing network configuration conflicts and
> ultimately interrupting the services carried by the stacking system.
> 
> To improve network stability, "non-stacking" solutions have been increasingly
> adopted, particularly by public cloud providers and tech companies
> like Alibaba, Tencent, and Didi. "non-stacking" is a method of mimicing switch
> stacking that convinces a LACP peer, bonding in this case, connected to a set of
> "non-stacked" switches that all of its ports are connected to a single
> switch (i.e., LACP aggregator), as if those switches were stacked. This
> enables the LACP peer's ports to aggregate together, and requires (a)
> special switch configuration, described in the linked article, and (b)
> modifications to the bonding 802.3ad (LACP) mode to send all ARP / ND
> packets across all ports of the active aggregator.
> 
>   -----------     -----------
>  |  switch1  |   |  switch2  |
>   -----------     -----------
>          ^           ^
>          |           |
>        -----------------
>       |   bond4 lacp    |
>        -----------------
>          |           |
>          | NIC1      | NIC2
>        -----------------
>       |     server      |
>        -----------------
> 
> - https://www.ruijie.com/fr-fr/support/tech-gallery/de-stack-data-center-network-architecture/
> 
> Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <tonghao@bamaicloud.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zengbing Tu <tuzengbing@didiglobal.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/networking/bonding.rst |  6 ++++
>  drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c      | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c   | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/net/bond_options.h           |  1 +
>  include/net/bonding.h                |  3 ++
>  5 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-14  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250514092534.27472-1-tonghao@bamaicloud.com>
2025-05-14  9:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] net: bonding: add broadcast_neighbor option for 802.3ad Tonghao Zhang
2025-05-14  9:36   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2025-05-14  9:46     ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-05-14  9:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/4] net: bonding: add broadcast_neighbor netlink option Tonghao Zhang
2025-05-14  9:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: bonding: send peer notify when failure recovery Tonghao Zhang
2025-05-14  9:39   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-05-14  9:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: bonding: add tracepoint for 802.3ad Tonghao Zhang
2025-05-14  9:39   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-05-15  9:30   ` Jay Vosburgh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7522bff2-eba5-40fd-8136-31392dac3e96@blackwall.org \
    --to=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tonghao@bamaicloud.com \
    --cc=tuzengbing@didiglobal.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox