From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 09/11] rxrpc: Fix keyring reference count leak in rxrpc_setsockopt()
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:24:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <754861.1774596280@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhRvkw8eopbCei6XQY3Fi-nDk+FyuXUWs8ToQyHE9J229_v0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com> wrote:
> To make the logic more coherent, what if we check if (rx->key ||
> rx->securities) in both options and remove the rx->securities check from
> rxrpc_request_key()?
You're allowed to have both a keyring (server) and a key (client). You can
issue client calls on a server socket. The in-kernel kafs filesystem does
this, for example - though it normally sets the outgoing key on individual
calls.
To parallel the kernel example, it might be worth my while adding a CMSG tag
to take a key ID or key description so the rxrpc_sendmsg() can do a
request_key() when setting up a call (the AF_RXRPC socket allows a different
key with each call dispatched), though the AFS command line tools tend only to
talk to a single cell at a time (you only need one key for comms with an
entire cell).
Davod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-27 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 13:18 [PATCH net v3 00/11] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 01/11] rxrpc: Fix key quota calculation for multitoken keys David Howells
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 02/11] rxrpc: Fix key parsing memleak David Howells
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 03/11] rxrpc: Fix anonymous key handling David Howells
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 04/11] list: Move on_list_rcu() to list.h and add on_list() also David Howells
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 05/11] rxrpc: Fix call removal to use RCU safe deletion David Howells
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 06/11] rxrpc: Fix RxGK token loading to check bounds David Howells
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 07/11] rxrpc: Fix use of wrong skb when comparing queued RESP challenge serial David Howells
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 08/11] rxrpc: Fix rack timer warning to report unexpected mode David Howells
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 09/11] rxrpc: Fix keyring reference count leak in rxrpc_setsockopt() David Howells
2026-03-27 1:06 ` Anderson Nascimento
2026-03-27 7:24 ` David Howells [this message]
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 10/11] rxrpc: Fix key reference count leak from call->key David Howells
2026-03-26 13:18 ` [PATCH net v3 11/11] rxrpc: Fix to request an ack if window is limited David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=754861.1774596280@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=anderson@allelesecurity.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox