From: Dimitri Daskalakis <dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, edumazet@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: drv-net: hds: restore HDS settings in ioctl_set_xdp
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 13:13:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <754d48b0-943c-471e-9e10-f8f23d35994d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179424805404.994134.17832090759573772957@kernel.org>
On 11/9/26 1:14 PM, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
>
> Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 1
>
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
>
> - [Medium] The fix is incomplete: two sibling tests in
> tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hds.py still change tcp-data-split…
> - [Low] The patch has no Fixes: tag.
>
> --
>
> selftests: drv-net: hds: restore HDS settings in ioctl_set_xdp
>
> This patch makes ioctl_set_xdp() in the drv-net hds.py selftest call
> _defer_reset_hds() before it sets tcp-data-split to "unknown". The
> original HDS configuration is then restored when the test finishes, the
> same way set_xdp() already does it.
>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hds.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hds.py
>> index 7f052c3196039..a1ea195743b56 100755
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hds.py
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hds.py
>> @@ -254,6 +254,7 @@ def ioctl_set_xdp(cfg, netnl) -> None:
>> """
>> mode = _get_hds_mode(cfg, netnl)
>> if mode == 'enabled':
>> + _defer_reset_hds(cfg, netnl)
>> netnl.rings_set({'header': {'dev-index': cfg.ifindex},
>> 'tcp-data-split': 'unknown'})
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Is this fix complete? Two sibling tests in hds.py still change
> tcp-data-split, and they defer only a fixed reset to "unknown" instead of
> going through _defer_reset_hds():
>
> tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hds.py:enabled_set_xdp() {
> ...
> netnl.rings_set({'header': {'dev-index': cfg.ifindex},
> 'tcp-data-split': 'enabled'})
>
> defer(netnl.rings_set, {'header': {'dev-index': cfg.ifindex},
> 'tcp-data-split': 'unknown'})
> ...
> }
>
> ioctl_enabled_set_xdp() uses the same pattern.
>
> When "unknown" does not bring back the saved value, _hds_reset() falls
> back to setting that value explicitly:
>
> if cur.get('tcp-data-split') == rings['tcp-data-split']:
> del arg['tcp-data-split']
> else:
> # Try the explicit setting
> arg['tcp-data-split'] = rings['tcp-data-split']
>
> The fixed resets have no such fallback. If the operator set "enabled" or
> "disabled" explicitly, and the driver reports a different value under
> "unknown", that setting is lost.
>
> Here is the test order in main():
>
> set_xdp,
> enabled_set_xdp,
> ioctl,
> ioctl_set_xdp,
> ioctl_enabled_set_xdp],
>
> In a default full run, enabled_set_xdp() has already left the device at
> "unknown" before ioctl_set_xdp() starts. The new _defer_reset_hds() call
> therefore only saves that already-reset state. ioctl_enabled_set_xdp()
> runs last and leaves the device at "unknown" again.
>
> Doesn't that mean this change only has a visible effect when
> ioctl_set_xdp is run by itself with -t?
>
> The previous patch in this series, "selftests: drv-net: hds: perturb
> settings via ioctl in ioctl_enabled_set_xdp", edited
> ioctl_enabled_set_xdp() but kept its fixed "unknown" reset.
>
> Could enabled_set_xdp() and ioctl_enabled_set_xdp() also call
> _defer_reset_hds(cfg, netnl) before they set 'enabled'?
>
It's true that there is no visible effect unless the test is run standalone
or with a non-default config, but the point of the patch was to bring this
in line with set_xdp().
I'd leave the fixed "unknown" resets as is. _defer_reset_hds() handles some
additional scenarios, but as in my reply on patch 1, netlink reports state
rather than config, so no reset can cover all cases.
> [Severity: Low]
> Should this patch carry a Fixes: tag? Commit ee3ae27721fb
> ("selftests: drv-net: hds: restore hds settings") added _defer_reset_hds()
> to set_xdp() and the set_hds_* tests, but not to ioctl_set_xdp().
> Something like:
>
> Fixes: ee3ae27721fb ("selftests: drv-net: hds: restore hds settings")
>
> The test itself was added by 29b036be1b0b ("selftests: drv-net: test XDP,
> HDS auto and the ioctl path"), which would also be a reasonable target.
>
This change is not critical enough for a Fixes tag.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 3:12 [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests: drv-net: hds: fix state leaks and ioctl tests Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-11-06 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] selftests: drv-net: hds: always restore tcp-data-split to auto Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-11-09 18:14 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-09 20:59 ` Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-11-06 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] selftests: drv-net: hds: perturb settings via ioctl in ioctl_enabled_set_xdp Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-11-06 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: drv-net: hds: restore HDS settings in ioctl_set_xdp Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-11-09 18:14 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-09 21:13 ` Dimitri Daskalakis [this message]
2026-11-11 0:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests: drv-net: hds: fix state leaks and ioctl tests patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=754d48b0-943c-471e-9e10-f8f23d35994d@gmail.com \
--to=dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox