netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>,
	sambat goson <sombat3960@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ps3/gelic: Fix SKB allocation
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:37:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <757018c2d9bd235cd2dad4363fb9a54354c9a372.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f5ffc7d-4b2e-4f07-bc7e-97d49ccff28c@infradead.org>

Hi,

On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 18:25 +0900, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Commit 3ce4f9c3fbb3 ("net/ps3_gelic_net: Add gelic_descr structures")
> of 6.8-rc1 did not set up the ps3 gelic network SKB's correctly,
> resulting in a kernel panic.
>     
> This fix changes the way the napi buffer and corresponding SKB are
> allocated and managed.
>     
> Reported-by: sambat goson <sombat3960@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 3ce4f9c3fbb3 ("net/ps3_gelic_net: Add gelic_descr structures")
> Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>

The patch overall looks correct to me, but there are a few formal
issues worthy to be addressed, see below.

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
> index d5b75af163d3..1870f173e850 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
> @@ -375,20 +375,16 @@ static int gelic_card_init_chain(struct gelic_card *card,
>  static int gelic_descr_prepare_rx(struct gelic_card *card,
>  				  struct gelic_descr *descr)
>  {
> -	static const unsigned int rx_skb_size =
> -		ALIGN(GELIC_NET_MAX_FRAME, GELIC_NET_RXBUF_ALIGN) +
> -		GELIC_NET_RXBUF_ALIGN - 1;
> +	static const unsigned int napi_buff_size =
> +		round_up(GELIC_NET_MAX_FRAME, GELIC_NET_RXBUF_ALIGN);
> +

No empty line in the declaration area.

> +	struct device *dev = ctodev(card);
>  	dma_addr_t cpu_addr;
> -	int offset;
> +	void *napi_buff;
>  
>  	if (gelic_descr_get_status(descr) !=  GELIC_DESCR_DMA_NOT_IN_USE)
> -		dev_info(ctodev(card), "%s: ERROR status\n", __func__);
> +		dev_info(dev, "%s: ERROR status\n", __func__);
>  
> -	descr->skb = netdev_alloc_skb(*card->netdev, rx_skb_size);
> -	if (!descr->skb) {
> -		descr->hw_regs.payload.dev_addr = 0; /* tell DMAC don't touch memory */
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
>  	descr->hw_regs.dmac_cmd_status = 0;
>  	descr->hw_regs.result_size = 0;
>  	descr->hw_regs.valid_size = 0;
> @@ -397,24 +393,33 @@ static int gelic_descr_prepare_rx(struct gelic_card *card,
>  	descr->hw_regs.payload.size = 0;
>  	descr->skb = NULL;
>  
> -	offset = ((unsigned long)descr->skb->data) &
> -		(GELIC_NET_RXBUF_ALIGN - 1);
> -	if (offset)
> -		skb_reserve(descr->skb, GELIC_NET_RXBUF_ALIGN - offset);
> -	/* io-mmu-map the skb */
> -	cpu_addr = dma_map_single(ctodev(card), descr->skb->data,
> -				  GELIC_NET_MAX_FRAME, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> -	descr->hw_regs.payload.dev_addr = cpu_to_be32(cpu_addr);
> -	if (dma_mapping_error(ctodev(card), cpu_addr)) {
> -		dev_kfree_skb_any(descr->skb);
> +	napi_buff = napi_alloc_frag_align(napi_buff_size,
> +		GELIC_NET_RXBUF_ALIGN);

Please align with the above bracket:

	napi_buff = napi_alloc_frag_align(napi_buff_size,
					  GELIC_NET_RXBUF_ALIGN);

> +
> +	if (unlikely(!napi_buff)) {
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}

The brackets are not needed here.

> +
> +	descr->skb = napi_build_skb(napi_buff, napi_buff_size);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!descr->skb)) {
> +		skb_free_frag(napi_buff);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	cpu_addr = dma_map_single(dev, napi_buff, napi_buff_size,
> +		DMA_FROM_DEVICE);

Please align with the above bracket

> +
> +	if (dma_mapping_error(dev, cpu_addr)) {
> +		skb_free_frag(napi_buff);
>  		descr->skb = NULL;
> -		dev_info(ctodev(card),
> -			 "%s:Could not iommu-map rx buffer\n", __func__);
> +		dev_err_once(dev, "%s:Could not iommu-map rx buffer\n",
> +			__func__);

Same here.

Side note: as a nice net-next follow-up you could move the skb
allocation into gelic_net_pass_skb_up() - so that the skbuff is hot in
the cache at rx time.


Cheers,

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-30 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-26  9:25 [PATCH net] ps3/gelic: Fix SKB allocation Geoff Levand
2024-01-30 12:37 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2024-02-05  0:08   ` Geoff Levand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=757018c2d9bd235cd2dad4363fb9a54354c9a372.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sombat3960@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).