netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 13/18] net/sched: act_mirred: Move the recursion counter struct netdev_xmit
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:29:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75e10631-00a3-405a-b4d8-96b422ffbe41@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250414160754.503321-14-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

On 4/14/25 6:07 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> mirred_nest_level is a per-CPU variable and relies on disabled BH for its
> locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on PREEMPT_RT
> this data structure requires explicit locking.
> 
> Move mirred_nest_level to struct netdev_xmit as u8, provide wrappers.
> 
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h |  3 +++
>  net/sched/act_mirred.c         | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h b/include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h
> index 3bbbc1a9860a3..4793ec42b1faa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ struct netdev_xmit {
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DUP_NETDEV)
>  	u8 nf_dup_skb_recursion;
>  #endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_ACT_MIRRED)
> +	u8 sched_mirred_nest;
> +#endif
>  };

How many of such recursion counters do you foresee will be needed?

AFAICS this one does not fit the existing hole anymore; the binary
layout before this series is:

 struct netdev_xmit {
                /* typedef u16 -> __u16 */ short unsigned int recursion;
                /*  2442     2 */
                /* typedef u8 -> __u8 */ unsigned char      more;
                /*  2444     1 */
                /* typedef u8 -> __u8 */ unsigned char
skip_txqueue;                /*  2445     1 */
        } net_xmit; /*  2442     4 */

        /* XXX 2 bytes hole, try to pack */

and this series already added 2 u8 fields. Since all the recursion
counters could be represented with less than 8 bits, perhaps using a
bitfield here could be worthy?!?

In any case I think we need explicit ack from the sched people.

> diff --git a/net/sched/act_mirred.c b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> index 5b38143659249..5f01f567c934d 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,29 @@ static LIST_HEAD(mirred_list);
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mirred_list_lock);
>  
>  #define MIRRED_NEST_LIMIT    4
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, mirred_nest_level);
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +static u8 tcf_mirred_nest_level_inc_return(void)
> +{
> +	return __this_cpu_inc_return(softnet_data.xmit.sched_mirred_nest);
> +}
> +
> +static void tcf_mirred_nest_level_dec(void)
> +{
> +	__this_cpu_dec(softnet_data.xmit.sched_mirred_nest);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +static u8 tcf_mirred_nest_level_inc_return(void)
> +{
> +	return current->net_xmit.sched_mirred_nest++;
> +}
> +
> +static void tcf_mirred_nest_level_dec(void)
> +{
> +	current->net_xmit.sched_mirred_nest--;
> +}
> +#endif

There are already a few of this construct. Perhaps it would be worthy to
implement a netdev_xmit() helper returning a ptr to the whole struct and
use it to reduce the number of #ifdef

Thanks,

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-17  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-14 16:07 [PATCH net-next v2 00/18] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/18] net: page_pool: Don't recycle into cache on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/18] net: dst_cache: Use nested-BH locking for dst_cache::cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/18] ipv4/route: Use this_cpu_inc() for stats on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/18] ipv6: sr: Use nested-BH locking for hmac_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/18] xdp: Use nested-BH locking for system_page_pool Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/18] netfilter: nf_dup{4, 6}: Move duplication check to task_struct Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-29  9:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/18] netfilter: nft_inner: Use nested-BH locking for nft_pcpu_tun_ctx Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/18] netfilter: nf_dup_netdev: Move the recursion counter struct netdev_xmit Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/18] xfrm: Use nested-BH locking for nat_keepalive_sk_ipv[46] Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/18] openvswitch: Merge three per-CPU structures into one Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/18] openvswitch: Use nested-BH locking for ovs_pcpu_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/18] openvswitch: Move ovs_frag_data_storage into the struct ovs_pcpu_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-15 16:26   ` Aaron Conole
2025-04-16 16:45     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-17  8:01       ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-17  9:08         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-17  9:48           ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-17 10:18             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-17 15:07         ` Aaron Conole
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/18] net/sched: act_mirred: Move the recursion counter struct netdev_xmit Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-17  8:29   ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2025-04-17 10:47     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-17 11:31       ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 14/18] net/sched: Use nested-BH locking for sch_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 15/18] mptcp: Use nested-BH locking for hmac_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 16/18] rds: Disable only bottom halves in rds_page_remainder_alloc() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 17/18] rds: Acquire per-CPU pointer within BH disabled section Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-14 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 18/18] rds: Use nested-BH locking for rds_page_remainder Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75e10631-00a3-405a-b4d8-96b422ffbe41@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).