From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"Nicolò Veronese" <nicveronese@gmail.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
mwojtas@chromium.org,
"Romain Gantois" <romain.gantois@bootlin.com>,
"Daniel Golle" <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
"Dimitri Fedrau" <dimitri.fedrau@liebherr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 00/10] net: phy_port: SFP modules representation and phy_port listing
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 09:35:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76e290cd-22bd-4ed3-b2b3-036e1edff140@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403123755.175742-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
On 4/3/26 2:37 PM, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Here's V9 for the phy_port netlink interface (get-only for now).
>
> V9 addresses sashiko's issues (not all of them, as some don't make
> sense), and updates the missings parts in the doc.
>
> This work extends on the recent addition of phy_port representation to enable
> listing the front-facing ports of an interface. For now, we don't control
> these ports, we merely list their presence and their capabilities.
>
> As the most common use-case of multi-port interfaces is combo-ports that
> provide both RJ45 and SFP connectors on a single MAC, there's a lot of
> SFP stuff in this series.
>
> This series is in 2 main parts. The first one aims at representing the
> SFP cages and modules using phy_port, as combo-ports with RJ45 + SFP are
> by far the most common cases for multi-connector setups.
>
> The second part is the netlink interface to list those ports, now that
> most use-cases are covered.
>
> Let's see what we can do with some examples of the new ethtool API :
>
> - Get MII interfaces supported by an empty SFP cage :
>
> # ethtool --show-ports eth3
>
> Port for eth3:
> Port id: 1
> Vacant: yes
> Supported MII interfaces : sgmii, 1000base-x, 2500base-x
> Port type: sfp
>
> - Get Combo-ports supported modes, on each port :
>
> # ethtool --show-ports eth1
>
> Port for eth1:
> Port id: 1
> Vacant: no
> Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> 1000baseT/Full
> 10000baseT/Full
> 2500baseT/Full
> 5000baseT/Full
>
> Port type: mdi
>
> Port for eth1:
> Port id: 2
> Vacant: yes
> Supported MII interfaces : 10gbase-r
> Port type: sfp
>
> - Get Achievable linkmodes on a SFP module (combo port with a DAC in the
> SFP cage)
>
> # ethtool --show-ports eth1
>
> Port for eth1:
> Port id: 1
> Vacant: no
> Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> 1000baseT/Full
> 10000baseT/Full
> 2500baseT/Full
> 5000baseT/Full
> Port type: mdi
>
> Port for eth1:
> Port id: 2
> Vacant: no
> Supported MII interfaces : 10gbase-r
> Port type: sfp
>
> Port for eth1:
> Port id: 3
> Vacant: no
> Supported link modes: 10000baseCR/Full
> Port type: mdi
>
> Note that here, we have 3 ports :
> - The Copper port
> - The SFP Cage itself, marked as 'occupied'
> - The SFP module
>
> This series builds on top of phy_port and phy_link_topology to allow
> tracking the ports of an interface. We maintain a list of supported
> linkmodes/interfaces on each port, which allows for fine-grained
> reporting of each port's capability.
>
> What this series doesn't do :
> - We don't support selecting which port is active. This is the next step.
> - We only support PHY-driven combo ports. The end-goal of this whole
> journey that started with phy_link_topology is to get support for MII
> muxes, such as the one we have on the Turris Omnia. This will eventually
> be upstreamed as well.
>
> If you want to play around with it, here's [1] the patched ethtool that I've
> been using to produce the outputs above.
>
> Thanks !
>
> Maxime
>
> [1] : https://github.com/minimaxwell/ethtool/tree/mc/ethtool_port
Some feedback from Andrew, Russell or Heiner would be very appreciated.
@Maxime: I went over sashiko feedback and I *think* it ranges from
orthogonal to wrong, but it would be useful if you could go over it.
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-09 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 12:37 [PATCH net-next v9 00/10] net: phy_port: SFP modules representation and phy_port listing Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-03 12:37 ` [PATCH net-next v9 01/10] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Add a helper for opportunistic alloc Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-03 12:37 ` [PATCH net-next v9 02/10] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Track ports in phy_link_topology Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-03 12:37 ` [PATCH net-next v9 03/10] net: phylink: Register a phy_port for MAC-driven SFP busses Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-03 12:37 ` [PATCH net-next v9 04/10] net: phy: Create SFP phy_port before registering upstream Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-03 12:37 ` [PATCH net-next v9 05/10] net: phy: Represent PHY-less SFP modules with phy_port Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-03 12:37 ` [PATCH net-next v9 06/10] net: phylink: " Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-03 12:37 ` [PATCH net-next v9 07/10] net: phy: phy_port: Store information about a MII port's vacant state Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-03 12:37 ` [PATCH net-next v9 08/10] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Add a helper to retrieve ports Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-03 12:37 ` [PATCH net-next v9 09/10] netlink: specs: Add ethernet port listing with ethtool Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-03 12:37 ` [PATCH net-next v9 10/10] net: ethtool: Introduce ethtool command to list ports Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-09 7:35 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-04-09 8:40 ` [PATCH net-next v9 00/10] net: phy_port: SFP modules representation and phy_port listing Maxime Chevallier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76e290cd-22bd-4ed3-b2b3-036e1edff140@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dimitri.fedrau@liebherr.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwojtas@chromium.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicveronese@gmail.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=romain.gantois@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox