Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>,
	edumazet@google.com, ncardwell@google.com, kuniyu@google.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
	dsahern@kernel.org, 0x7f454c46@gmail.com, fruggeri@arista.com,
	noureddine@arista.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/tcp-ao: fix use-after-free of current_key on reconnect to another peer
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:49:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77e147e1-b183-46ae-a9de-dc5d2cfd2f06@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aoIriv3pHDgII2YR@v4bel>

On 8/16/26 11:28 PM, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> tcp_inbound_ao_hash() is called before bh_lock_sock_nested() is taken,
> with only rcu_read_lock() held. On the fast path for established
> sockets, if the rnext_keyid sent by the peer differs from
> current_key->sndid, the key the peer asked for is looked up and stored
> in current_key. The lookup is inside the RCU read side, but current_key
> outlives it.
> 
> When the socket is disconnected and connect() is called again for
> another peer, tcp_ao_connect_init() unlinks every key that does not
> match the new peer and frees it with call_rcu(). If current_key points
> at such a key, it is cleared to NULL.
> 
> The fast path reads sk_state only once on entry, so a softirq that got
> into it while the socket was still established can update current_key
> after that loop has already run. The update is inside the RCU read side,
> so it comes before the call_rcu() callback, and once the callback frees
> the key, current_key is left pointing at freed memory.
> 
> The next transmission picks that pointer up in tcp_get_current_key().
> tcp_ao_transmit_skb() then reads the traffic key from the freed object,
> which is the use-after-free.
> 
> Wait for one grace period before unlinking, and only if a key is going
> to be removed. By the time tcp_connect() runs the socket is already in
> TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_AO_ESTABLISHED does not contain TCPF_SYN_SENT, so
> a softirq entering after the wait cannot reach the fast path, and the
> ones already in it have finished. The existing NULL handling in the loop
> is then enough.
> 
> Fixes: 0a3a809089eb ("net/tcp: Verify inbound TCP-AO signed segments")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c
> index e4ec60a3349635..5094267447aee5 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c
> @@ -1160,6 +1160,15 @@ void tcp_ao_connect_init(struct sock *sk)
>  	l3index = l3mdev_master_ifindex_by_index(sock_net(sk),
>  						 sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
>  
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(key, &ao_info->head, node) {
> +		if (tcp_ao_key_cmp(key, l3index, addr, key->prefixlen,
> +				   family, -1, -1)) {
> +			/* pairs with tcp_inbound_ao_hash() */
> +			synchronize_rcu();

My understanding is that the above will rate-limit _only_
disconnect()/connect() sequences. Since the former op is basically evil,
I think that the extremely severe constraint on it is acceptable.

Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(key, next, &ao_info->head, node) {
>  		if (!tcp_ao_key_cmp(key, l3index, addr, key->prefixlen, family, -1, -1))
>  			continue;


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-20 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-16 21:28 [PATCH net] net/tcp-ao: fix use-after-free of current_key on reconnect to another peer Hyunwoo Kim
2026-08-19 16:56 ` Simon Horman
2026-08-20 10:49 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77e147e1-b183-46ae-a9de-dc5d2cfd2f06@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fruggeri@arista.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noureddine@arista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox